GRI^™ Standards Index

102-14

A statement from the most senior decision-maker of the organization (such as CEO, chair, or equivalent senior position) about the relevance of sustainability to the organization and its strategy for addressing sustainability.

CEO Message

102-15

Provide a description of key impacts, risks, and opportunities.

Executive Summary

102-1

Name of the organization

Leidos

102-2

Report the primary brands, products, and services, including an explanation of any products or services that are banned in certain markets.

As of December 2019, we employed approximately 33,522 full and part-time employees in more than 29 countries worldwide. Headquartered in Reston, Va., Leidos reported annual revenues of approximately $11.1 billion for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019. Our mission is to make the world safer, healthier, and more efficient through information technology, engineering, and science. At January 3, 2020, our business is aligned into three reportable segments (Defense Solutions, Civil and Health), and our Corporate functions. Our operations and reportable segments are organized around the markets we serve. We provide a wide array of scientific, engineering and technical services and solutions across these reportable segments. Less than 10% of our revenues and tangible long-lived assets are generated by or owned by entities located outside of the United States. Effective the beginning of fiscal 2019, we changed the composition of our Defense Solutions reportable segment to better align the operations within the reportable segment to the customers we serve. This resulted in the identification of new operating segments within Defense Solutions.

See 2019 Annual Report for additional information on our primary brand, products, and services.

102-3

Report the location of the organization's headquarters.

CY 2019: 11951 Freedom Drive, Reston, VA 20190

As of March 2020: 1950 Presidents Street, Reston, VA 20190

102-4

Number of countries where the organization operates, and the names of countries where it has significant operations and/or that are relevant to the topics covered in the report.

People > Employee Demographics and Statistics

102-5

Nature of ownership and legal form.

Corporation (LDOS)

102-6

Markets served including: Geographic locations where products and services are offered, sectors served, types of customers and beneficiaries.

See 2019 Annual Report

102-7

Report the scale of the organization (total number of employees, operations, net sales, total capitalization, quantity of products/services provided).

See 2019 Annual Report

102-8

Total number of employees by employment contract (permanent and temporary), by gender.

Total number of employees by employment contract (permanent and temporary), by region.

Total number of employees by employment type (full-time and part-time), by gender.

Whether a significant portion of the organization’s activities are performed by workers who are not employees. If applicable, a description of the nature and scale of work performed by workers who are not employees.

Any significant variations in the numbers reported (such as seasonal variations in the tourism or agricultural industries).

An explanation of how the data have been compiled, including any assumptions made.

People > Employee Demographics and Statistics

See 2019 Annual Report

102-41

Stakeholder Engagement: Percentage of total employees covered by collective bargaining.

Currently, 0.8% of Leidos employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements.

102-9

A description of the organization's supply chain, including its main elements as they relate to the organization’s activities, primary brands, products, and services.

Supplier and Small Business Relationships

102-10

Significant changes to the organization’s size, structure, ownership, or supply chain, including:

Changes in the location of, or changes in, operations, including facility openings, closings, and expansions;

Changes in the share capital structure and other capital formation, maintenance, and alteration operations (for private sector organizations);

Changes in the location of suppliers, the structure of the supply chain, or relationships with suppliers, including selection and termination.

See 2019 Annual Report

During fiscal 2019, we acquired IMX Medical Management Services and its affiliated businesses. In early fiscal 2020, we acquired Dynetics, Inc. and entered into a definitive agreement to acquire L3Harris Technologies' security detection and automation businesses. See "Note 6—Acquisitions" and "Note 27—Subsequent Events" in Part II of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information. Additionally, during fiscal 2019, we divested of our commercial cybersecurity and health staff augmentation businesses. For further information, see "Note 7—Divestitures" in Part II of the Annual Report on Form 10-K.  

102-11

Whether and how the organization applies the Precautionary Principal or approach. 

Leidos maintains a corporate-level Enterprise Risk Management Council (ERMC) to review business activities that present, or have the potential to present, significant risk to the company. Risks and their mitigation plans are identified by relevant operating units and functions. The ERMC reviews those plans to ensure that necessary actions are implemented to avoid, mitigate, and manage those risks and that the steps taken are in-line with the company’s overall risk tolerance.

102-12

A list of externally developed economic, environmental and social charters, principles, or other initiatives to which the organization subscribes or which it endorses.

The Leidos corporate responsibility report is developed in compliance with the GRI Standards Reporting Framework. Additionally, Leidos subject matter experts participate in a number of collaborative efforts with stakeholders and external organizations. Additionally, Leidos has signed on to the Business Roundtable’s Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation.

102-13

A list of the main memberships of industry or other associations, and national or international advocacy organizations.

Leidos participates in numerous professional industry associations and community/non-profit organizations related to our business as well as the communities in which employees live and work, respectively. Leidos employees hold leadership positions in many of these organizations. We do not currently have a centralized list of all involvement.

102-45

A list of all entities included in the organization’s consolidated financial statements or equivalent documents;

Whether any entity included in the organization’s consolidated financial statements or equivalent documents is not covered by the report.

See 2019 Annual Report

102-46

An explanation of the process for defining the report content and the topic Boundaries;

An explanation of how the organization has implemented the Reporting Principles for defining report content.

About Our Reporting

102-47

List all the material Aspects identified in the process for defining report content.

GRI Standards Index

About Our Reporting

103-1

Explanation of the material topic and its Boundary

An explanation of why the topic is material;

• The Boundary for the material topic, which includes a description of where the impacts occur; the organization’s involvement with the impacts. For example, whether the organization has caused or contributed to the impacts, or is directly linked to the impacts through its business relationships;
• Any specific limitation regarding the topic Boundary

All statements regarding our core values and commitment to data privacy, ethics, and integrity apply to the entire enterprise. References to numbers of employees and associated metrics apply to the entire enterprise, except where noted otherwise. Most employee benefit programs addressed within this report relate to Leidos U.S. operations, which make up the preponderance of our workforce, and may exclude certain U.S. subsidiaries. In keeping with our workforce distributions, this report highlights activities within our U.S. operations, including subsidiaries and leased facilities, while presenting selected data on our worldwide enterprise. Information about our business and financial performance, reported pursuant to our fiscal year ended December, 2019, is provided in our 2019 Annual Report

103-2

The management approach and its components

• An explanation of how the organization manages the topic.
• A statement of the purpose of the management approach.
• A description of the following, if the management approach includes that component:

1. Policies;
2. Commitments;
3. Goals and targets;
4. Responsibilities;
5. Resources;
6. Grievance mechanisms;
7. Specific actions, such as processes, projects, programs and initiatives

The management approach for material topics is addressed in the introduction of the corresponding section of this report.

103-3

Evaluation of the management approach

• An explanation of how the organization evaluates the management approach, including:
• The mechanisms for evaluating the effectiveness of the management approach;
• The results of the evaluation of the management approach;
• Any related adjustments to the management approach.

A summary of the evaluation of our management approach is addressed in the introduction of the corresponding section of this report.

102-48

The effect of any restatements of information given in previous reports, and the reasons for such restatements.

No major restatements during the period 2019.

102-49

Significant changes from previous reporting periods in the list of material topics and topic boundaries.

This report contains no significant changes to scope, boundary, or measurement methods used in previously published corporate responsibility reports.

102-40

A list of stakeholder groups engaged by the organization.

About Our Reporting

102-42

The basis for identifying and selecting stakeholders with whom to engage.

About Our Reporting

102-43

The organization’s approach to stakeholder engagement, including frequency of engagement by type and by stakeholder group, and an indication of whether any of the engagement was undertaken specifically as part of the report preparation process.

About Our Reporting

102-44

Key topics and concerns that have been raised through stakeholder engagement, including:

How the organization has responded to those key topics and concerns, including through its reporting;

The stakeholder groups that raised each of the key topics and concerns.

This is addressed with the relevant topics reported.

102-50

Reporting period for the information provided.

Calendar year 2019.

102-51

If applicable, the date of the most recent previous report.

Fall, 2019 (covering the period calendar year 2018).

102-52

Reporting cycle.

Annual

102-53

The contact point for questions regarding the report or its content.

Michael P. Coogan, Vice President, Director, Corporate Responsibility.

102-54

The claim made by the organization, if it has prepared a report in accordance with the GRI Standards, either:

• ‘This report has been prepared in accordance with the GRI Standards: Core option’;
• ‘This report has been prepared in accordance with the GRI Standards: Comprehensive option’

This report has been prepared in accordance with the GRI Standards: Core option.

102-55

The GRI content index, which specifies each of the GRI Standards used and lists all disclosures included in the report.

For each disclosure, the content index shall include:

• The number of the disclosure (for disclosures covered by the GRI Standards);
• The page number(s) or URL(s) where the information can be found, either within the report or in other published materials;
• If applicable, and where permitted, the reason(s) for omission when a required disclosure cannot be made.

GRI Standards Index

102-56

A description of the organization’s policy and current practice with regard to seeking external assurance for the report.

If the report has been externally assured:

• A reference to the external assurance report, statements, or opinions. If not included in the assurance report accompanying the sustainability report, a description of what has and what has not been assured and on what basis, including the assurance standards used, the level of assurance obtained, and any limitations of the assurance process;
• The relationship between the organization and the assurance provider;
• Whether and how the highest governance body or senior executives are involved in seeking external assurance for the organization’s sustainability report.

Leidos GRI reports are not currently externally assured. However, our greenhouse gas emissions data is externally assured by a third party.

102-18

Governance structure of the organization, including committees of the highest governance body.

Committees responsible for decision-making on economic, environmental, and social topics.

Leidos is governed by a board of directors comprising thirteen directors, twelve of which are independent directors as defined by the New York Stock Exchange and corporate governance guidelines. The board includes four standing committees, including an Corporate Governance and Ethics Committee, chartered with the responsibility to review such environmental, social and governance issues that may significantly impact the Company’s business operations, reputation or relations with employees, customers, stockholders and other constituents. The Governance and Ethics Committee also reviews legislative and regulatory trends and public policy developments that may affect the Company’s business, including government relations activity.

102-16

A description of the organization’s values, principles, standards, and norms of behavior.

Ethics and Compliance

102-17

A description of internal and external mechanisms for:

• Seeking advice about ethical and lawful behavior, and organizational integrity;
• Reporting concerns about unethical or unlawful behavior, and organizational integrity.

Ethics and Compliance

201-1

Direct economic value generated and distributed

Direct economic value generated and distributed (EVG&D) on an accruals basis, including the basic components for the organization’s global operations as listed below. If data are presented on a cash basis, report the justification for this decision in addition to reporting the following basic components:

• Direct economic value generated: revenues;
• Economic value distributed: operating costs, employee wages and benefits, payments to providers of capital, payments to government by country, and community investments;
• Economic value retained: 'direct economic value generated’ less ‘economic value distributed’.
• Where significant, report EVG&D separately at country, regional, or market levels, and the criteria used for defining significance.

See 2019 Annual Report

Community > Corporate Philanthropy

201-2

Financial implications and other risks and opportunities for the organization's activities due to climate change

Risks and opportunities posed by climate change that have the potential to generate substantive changes in operations, revenue, or expenditure, including:

• A description of the risk or opportunity and its classification as either physical, regulatory, or other;
• A description of the impact associated with the risk or opportunity;
• The financial implications of the risk or opportunity before action is taken;
• The methods used to manage the risk or opportunity;
• The costs of actions taken to manage the risk or opportunity.

Leidos reports relevant climate change risks and opportunities through CDP. Our latest response can be found here. Information on climate-related risks and opportunities can be found in section C2 – Risks and Opportunities.

201-3

Defined benefit plan obligations and other retirement plans

If the plan’s liabilities are met by the organization’s general resources, the estimated value of those liabilities.

If a separate fund exists to pay the plan’s pension liabilities:

• The extent to which the scheme’s liabilities are estimated to be covered by the assets that have been set aside to meet them;
• The basis on which that estimate has been arrived at;
• When that estimate was made.
• If a fund set up to pay the plan’s pension liabilities is not fully covered, explain the strategy, if any, adopted by the employer to work towards full coverage, and the timescale, if any, by which the employer hopes to achieve full coverage.
• Percentage of salary contributed by employee or employer.
• Level of participation in retirement plans, such as participation in mandatory or voluntary schemes, regional, or country-based schemes, or those with financial impact.

As of January 1, 2019, the Leidos Biomedical Research plan has 645 active participants, 532 deferred vested participants and 623 receiving pensions. This plan is approximately 99 percent funded as of January 1, 2019, on a stabilized funding basis. This plan was fully frozen on August 30, 2019. All participant accruals are fully frozen.

The second plan includes, as of 31 March 2019 the Calanais Pension trustee Co., LTD sponsored plan included: 156 deferred members, 78 pensioner members (including 6 dependent pensioner members) and funding level of 97%.

302-1

Energy consumption within the organization:

1. Total fuel consumption within the organization from non-renewable sources, in joules or multiples, and including fuel types used.
2. Total fuel consumption within the organization from renewable sources, in joules or multiples, and including fuel types used.
3. In joules, watt-hours or multiples, the total:
   1. electricity consumption
   2. heating consumption
   3. cooling consumption
   4. steam consumption
4. In joules, watt-hours or multiples, the total:
   1. electricity sold
   2. heating sold
   3. cooling sold
   4. steam sold
5. Total energy consumption within the organization, in joules or multiples.
6. Standards, methodologies, assumptions, and/or calculation tools used.
7. Source of the conversion factors used.

Environment > Corporate Footprint and Environmental Stewardship

Leidos followed the World Resource Institute and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WRI/WBCSD) GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Revised Edition) and The Climate Registry (TCR) General Reporting Protocol v2.1 for data collection and calculation methods, assumptions, and conversion factors.

Building-specific Assumptions:

• For owned buildings and leased buildings where Leidos is responsible for paying utility bills, electricity and natural gas data were collected from utility billing information.
• For leased buildings where Leidos is not responsible for paying electricity bills, electricity consumption   was estimated using the average intensity method described in The Climate Registry’s (TCR) General Reporting Protocol v3.0. This method multiplies the floor area of each lease by an assumed electricity intensity factor based on building type from the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s (EIA) Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey for 2012 (CBECS 2012). The resulting consumption was prorated based on the fraction of the year for which Leidos occupied each lease.
• For leased buildings where Leidos is not responsible for paying natural gas bills, natural gas consumption was estimated using the average intensity method described in The Climate Registry’s (TCR) General Reporting Protocol v3.0. This method multiplies the floor area of each lease by an assumed natural gas intensity factor based on building type from the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s (EIA) Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey for 2012 (CBECS 2012). The resulting consumption was prorated based on the fraction of the year for which Leidos occupied each lease.
• Diesel fuel use for generators at owned facilities was estimated by multiplying the number of hours each generator was in use during the calendar year by the fuel consumption rate (gallons per hour) specific to each generator model.
• Leidos-occupied floor area is reported as an annual equivalent value. The floor area of each lease is prorated according the fraction of the year each lease was active. For example, a 10,000 ft² office lease occupied by Leidos for half the year is equivalent to 5,000 ft² occupied for the entire year.

Fleet-specific Assumptions:

• Leidos vehicle data is taken from insurance policy data that is updated on a quarterly basis.
• Fuel consumption was prorated based on the disposal date of the vehicle. If the vehicle did not have a disposal date, it was conservatively assumed to have been used for the entire calendar year.

302-2

Energy consumption outside of the organization:

1. Energy consumption outside of the organization, in joules or multiples.
2. Standards, methodologies, assumptions, and/or calculation tools used.
3. Source of the conversion factors used.

Environment > Corporate Footprint and Environmental Stewardship

302-3

Energy intensity:

1. Energy intensity ratio for the organization.
2. Organization-specific metric (the denominator) chosen to calculate the ratio
3. Types of energy included in the intensity ratio; whether fuel, electricity, heating, cooling, steam, or all.
4. Whether the ratio uses energy consumption within the organization, outside of it, or both.

1. 96.6 kBtu/ft² (buildings energy only, fleet vehicle energy excluded)
2. Total owned and lease floor area is 6,775,416 ft² (Leidos-occupied floor area only, subleased floor area excluded)
3. Natural gas and electricity consumption in owned and leased buildings. Leidos does not purchase heating, cooling, steam, or any other fuels. Fleet vehicle fuel consumption is not captured because the base metric of the intensity ratio is floor area of buildings. Note that fleet vehicle fuel consumption accounts for less than 2% of total energy.
4. All reported energy is consumed within the organization.

302-4

Reduction of energy consumption:

1. Amount of reductions in energy consumption achieved as a direct result of conservation and efficiency initiatives, in joules or multiples.
2. Types of energy included in the reductions; whether fuel, electricity, heating, cooling, steam, or all.
3. Basis for calculating reductions in energy consumption, such as base year or baseline, including the rationale for choosing it.
4. Standards, methodologies, assumptions, and/or calculation tools used.

Environment > Corporate Footprint and Environmental Stewardship

Leidos followed the World Resource Institute and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WRI/WBCSD) GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Revised Edition) and The Climate Registry (TCR) General Reporting Protocol v2.1 for data collection and calculation methods, assumptions, and conversion factors.

Building-specific Assumptions:

• For owned buildings and leased buildings where Leidos is responsible for paying utility bills, electricity and natural gas data were collected from utility billing information.
• For leased buildings where Leidos is not responsible for paying electricity bills, electricity consumption was estimated using the average intensity method described in The Climate Registry’s (TCR) General Reporting Protocol v3.0. This method multiplies the floor area of each lease by an assumed electricity intensity factor based on building type from the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s (EIA) Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey for 2012 (CBECS 2012). The resulting consumption was prorated based on the fraction of the year for which Leidos occupied each lease.
• For leased buildings where Leidos is not responsible for paying natural gas bills, natural gas consumption was estimated using the average intensity method described in The Climate Registry’s (TCR) General Reporting Protocol v3.0. This method multiplies the floor area of each lease by an assumed natural gas intensity factor based on building type from the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s (EIA) Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey for 2012 (CBECS 2012). The resulting consumption was prorated based on the fraction of the year for which Leidos occupied each lease.
• Diesel fuel use for generators at owned facilities was estimated by multiplying the number of hours each generator was in use during the calendar year by the fuel consumption rate (gallons per hour) specific to each generator model.
• Leidos-occupied floor area is reported as an annual equivalent value. The floor area of each lease is prorated according the fraction of the year each lease was active. For example, a 10,000 ft² office lease occupied by Leidos for half the year is equivalent to 5,000 ft² occupied for the entire year.

Fleet-specific Assumptions:

• Leidos vehicle data is taken from insurance policy data that is updated on a quarterly basis.
• Fuel consumption was prorated based on the disposal date of the vehicle. If the vehicle did not have a disposal date, it was conservatively assumed to have been used for the entire calendar year.

305-1

Direct greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (Scope 1):

1. Gross direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions in metric tons of CO₂ equivalent.
2. Gases included in the calculation; whether CO₂, CH₄, N₂O, HFCs, PFCs, SF₆, NF₃, or all.
3. Biogenic CO₂ emissions in metric tons of CO₂ equivalent.
4. Base year for the calculation, if applicable, including:
   1. the rationale for choosing it;
   2. emissions in the base year;
   3. the context for any significant changes in emissions that triggered recalculations of base year emissions.
5. Source of the emission factors and the global warming potential (GWP) rates used, or a reference to the GWP source.
6. Consolidation approach for emissions; whether equity share, financial control, or operational control.
7. Standards, methodologies, assumptions, and/or calculation tools used.

Environment > Corporate Footprint and Environmental Stewardship

Base year and rationale:

Leidos utilizes a 2010 base year, because it was the year that Leidos began quantifying and reporting GHG emissions. Since most of our GHG emissions result from energy, 2010 is a logical base year for measuring energy savings also. In addition to measuring against the base year, Leidos finds it informative to measure year-over-year performance improvements.

Leidos followed the World Resource Institute and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WRI/WBCSD) GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Revised Edition) and The Climate Registry (TCR) General Reporting Protocol v2.1 for data collection and calculation methods, assumptions, and conversion factors.

Building-specific Assumptions:

• For owned buildings and leased buildings where Leidos is responsible for paying utility bills, electricity and natural gas data were collected from utility billing information.
• For leased buildings where Leidos is not responsible for paying electricity bills, electricity consumption   was estimated using the average intensity method described in The Climate Registry’s (TCR) General Reporting Protocol v3.0. This method multiplies the floor area of each lease by an assumed electricity intensity factor based on building type from the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s (EIA) Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey for 2012 (CBECS 2012). The resulting consumption was prorated based on the fraction of the year for which Leidos occupied each lease.
• For leased buildings where Leidos is not responsible for paying natural gas bills, natural gas consumption was estimated using the average intensity method described in The Climate Registry’s (TCR) General Reporting Protocol v3.0. This method multiplies the floor area of each lease by an assumed natural gas intensity factor based on building type from the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s (EIA) Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey for 2012 (CBECS 2012). The resulting consumption was prorated based on the fraction of the year for which Leidos occupied each lease.
• Diesel fuel use for generators at owned facilities was estimated by multiplying the number of hours each generator was in use during the calendar year by the fuel consumption rate (gallons per hour) specific to each generator model.
• Leidos-occupied floor area is reported as an annual equivalent value. The floor area of each lease is prorated according the fraction of the year each lease was active. For example, a 10,000 ft² office lease occupied by Leidos for half the year is equivalent to 5,000 ft² occupied for the entire year.

Fleet-specific Assumptions:

• Leidos vehicle data is taken from insurance policy data that is updated on a quarterly basis.
• Fuel consumption was prorated based on the disposal date of the vehicle. If the vehicle did not have a disposal date, it was conservatively assumed to have been used for the entire calendar year.

305-2

Energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions:

1. Gross location-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions in metric tons of CO₂ equivalent.
2. If applicable, gross market-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions in metric tons of CO₂ equivalent.
3. If available, the gases included in the calculation; whether CO₂, CH₄, N₂O, HFCs, PFCs, SF₆, NF₃, or all.
4. Base year for the calculation, if applicable, including:
   1. the rationale for choosing it;
   2. emissions in the base year;
   3. the context for any significant changes in emissions that triggered recalculations of base year emissions.
5. Source of the emission factors and the global warming potential (GWP) rates used, or a reference to the GWP source.
6. Consolidation approach for emissions; whether equity share, financial control, or operational control.
7. Standards, methodologies, assumptions, and/or calculation tools used.

Environment > Corporate Footprint and Environmental Stewardship

See response in 305-1 for Standards, Methodologies, and Assumptions Used for GHG Calculations

305-3

Other indirect greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (Scope 3):

1. Gross other indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions in metric tons of CO₂ equivalent.
2. If available, the gases included in the calculation; whether CO₂, CH₄, N₂O, HFCs, PFCs, SF₆, NF₃, or all.
3. Biogenic CO₂ emissions in metric tons of CO₂ equivalent.
4. Other indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions categories and activities included in the calculation.
5. Base year for the calculation, if applicable, including:

• the rationale for choosing it;
• emissions in the base year;
• the context for any significant changes in emissions that triggered recalculations of base year emissions.

6. Source of the emission factors and the global warming potential (GWP) rates used, or a reference to the GWP source.
7. Standards, methodologies, assumptions, and/or calculation tools used.

Environment > Corporate Footprint and Environmental Stewardship

See response in 305-1 for Standards, Methodologies, and Assumptions Used for GHG Calculations

305-4

Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity:

1. GHG emissions intensity ratio for the organization.
2. Organization-specific metric (the denominator) chosen to calculate the ratio.
3. Types of GHG emissions included in the intensity ratio; whether direct (Scope 1), energy indirect (Scope 2), and/or other indirect (Scope 3).
4. Gases included in the calculation; whether CO₂, CH₄, N₂O, HFCs, PFCs, SF₆, NF₃, or all.

1. 5.0 mtCO2e/$1M revenue 1.7 mtCO2e/FTE employee
2. $11.094B revenue 33,013 FTE employees
3. All direct (Scope 1), energy indirect (Scope 2) market-based emissions from buildings and fleet vehicles.  EXCLUDED: Scope 1 GHG emissions from fleet vehicles and Scope 3 GHG emissions from employee commuting and business travel are not captured in the emissions intensity ratio, because the base metric is building floor area.
4. All gases are included; however, Leidos activities do not generate any PFCs, SF₆, NF₃.

305-5

Reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions:

1. GHG emissions reduced as a direct result of reduction initiatives, in metric tons of CO₂ equivalent.
2. Gases included in the calculation; whether CO₂, CH₄, N₂O, HFCs, PFCs, SF₆, NF₃, or all.
3. Base year or baseline, including the rationale for choosing it.
4. Scopes in which reductions took place; whether direct (Scope 1), energy indirect (Scope 2), and/or other indirect (Scope 3).
5. Standards, methodologies, assumptions, and/or calculation tools used.

1. 10,567 mtCO₂e total reduction. 10,155 mtCO₂e from REC purchases, 243 mtCO₂e from elimination of under-performing real estate assets, and 169 mtCO₂e from lighting and HVAC energy efficiency measures.
2. CO₂, CH₄, N₂O. Reduction initiatives did not affect any other GHGs.
3. 2018 was selected as the base year for GHG reductions reported in this section to evaluate year-over-year improvements.
4. Direct (Scope 1), energy indirect (Scope 2) only. GHG emissions were reduced, in part, as a result of three initiatives: elimination of under-per- forming real estate assets, renewable energy purchases, and energy efficiency improvements. GHG reductions from eliminated real estate were assumed proportional to the reduction of Leidos-occupied floor area from 2018 to 2019 (-0.425%). GHG reductions from REC purchases were determined by multiplying total REC purchases (in MWh) by the 2020 Green-e Residual Mix emission factor for the eGRID subregion in which the purchasing facilities operate. The GHG reduction from energy efficiency improvements were determined by multiplying the annual energy savings (in kWh) of each project by the eGRID emission factors for the subregion in which each project was completed.

306-2

Waste by type and disposal method:

Report the total weight of hazardous and non-hazardous waste, by the following disposal methods:

• Reuse
• Recycling
• Composting
• Recovery, including energy recovery
• Incineration (mass burn)
• Deep well injection
• Landfill
• On-site storage
• Other (to be specified by the organization)

Total weight of non-hazardous waste, with a breakdown by the following disposal methods where applicable:

• Reuse
• Recycling
• Composting
• Recovery, including energy recovery
• Incineration (mass burn)
• Deep well injection
• Landfill
• On-site storage
• Other (to be specified by the organization)

How the waste disposal method has been determined:

• Disposed of directly by the organization, or otherwise directly confirmed
• Information provided by the waste disposal contractor
• Organizational defaults of the waste disposal contractor

Leidos has national contracts with professional waste management companies for recycling and waste disposal at all owned (not leased) facilities. Total recycling and compost waste details are provided in the Environment > Corporate Footprint and Environmental Stewardship section.

Leidos disposes of hazardous waste using Clean Harbors Environmental Services. In all cases, we are considered a small quantity generator per US EPA (less than 1,000 kilograms of hazardous waste per month). The waste is generally landfilled or incinerated at an EPA-permitted hazardous waste Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility (TSDF), as reported to Leidos by Clean Harbors Environmental Services.

New suppliers that were screened using environmental criteria

Percentage of new suppliers that were screened using environmental criteria.

Leidos did not screen suppliers for environmental criteria in 2019.

308-2

Negative environmental impacts in the supply chain and actions taken:

1. Number of suppliers assessed for environmental impacts.
2. Number of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative environmental impacts.
3. Significant actual and potential negative environmental impacts identified in the supply chain.
4. Percentage of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative environmental impacts with which improvements were agreed upon as a result of assessment.
5. Percentage of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative environmental impacts with which relationships were terminated as a result of assessment, and why.

1. None
2. None
3. None
4. 0 %
5. 0%

403-2

Types of injury and rates of injury, occupational diseases, lost days, and absenteeism, and number of work-related fatalities:

1. Types of injury, injury rate (IR), occupational disease rate (ODR), lost day rate (LDR), absentee rate (AR), and work-related fatalities, for all employees, with a breakdown by:
   1. Region;
   2. Gender.
2. Types of injury, injury rate (IR), and work-related fatalities, for all workers (excluding employees) whose work, or workplace, is controlled by the organization, with a breakdown by:
   1. Region;
   2. Gender.
3. The system of rules applied in recording and reporting accident statistics.

Leidos reports for the company's overall injury rate by total workforce only (vs. by gender or region).

Environment > Environmental Health and Safety

404-2

Programs for upgrading employee skills and transition assistance programs:

1. Type and scope of programs implemented and assistance provided to upgrade employee skills.
2. Transition assistance programs provided to facilitate continued employability and the management of career endings resulting from retirement or termination of employment.

People > Professional and Career Development

405-1

Diversity of governance bodies and employees:

• Percentage of individuals within the organization’s governance bodies in each of the following diversity categories:
  • Gender;
  • Age group: under 30 years old, 30-50 years old, over 50 years old;
  • Other indicators of diversity where relevant (such as minority or vulnerable groups).
• Percentage of employees per employee category in each of the following diversity categories:
  • Gender;
  • Age group: under 30 years old, 30-50 years old, over 50 years old;
  • Other indicators of diversity where relevant (such as minority or vulnerable groups).

For governance composition, see 102-18 response.

People > Employee Demographics and Statistics

414-1

New suppliers that were screened using social criteria

Percentage of new suppliers that were screened using social criteria.

Supplier and Small Business Relationships

414-2

Negative social impacts in the supply chain and actions taken:

• Number of suppliers assessed for social impacts.
• Number of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative social impacts.
• Significant actual and potential negative social impacts identified in the supply chain.
• Percentage of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative social impacts with which improvements were agreed upon as a result of assessment.
• Percentage of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative social impacts with which relationships were terminated as a result of assessment, and why.

Supplier and Small Business Relationships

Ethics and Compliance

413-1

Operations with local community engagement, impact assessments, and development programs:

• Percentage of operations with implemented local community engagement, impact assessments, and/or development programs, including the use of:
  • Social impact assessments, including gender impact assessments, based on participatory processes;
  • Environmental impact assessments and ongoing monitoring;
  • Public disclosure of results of environmental and social impact assessments;
  • Local community development programs based on local communities’ needs;
  • Stakeholder engagement plans based on stakeholder mapping;
  • Broad based local community consultation committees and processes that include vulnerable groups;
  • Works councils, occupational health and safety committees and other worker representation bodies to deal with impacts;
  • Formal local community grievance processes that include vulnerable groups;
  • Works councils, occupational health and safety committees and other worker representation bodies to deal with impacts;
  • Formal local community grievance processes 

Leidos does not currently track this metric. Most of our locations, however, engage in outreach within their communities. Included in this report are several examples of our efforts in both specific communities and amongst specific populations, as well as our community engagement priority areas. We believe that these programs and activities are effective, yet continue to look for ways to maximize their positive effects and minimize any negative impacts.

Community

Community > Corporate Philanthropy

205-1

Operations assessed for risks related to corruption:

• Total number and percentage of operations assessed for risks related to corruption.
• Significant risks related to corruption identified through the risk assessment.

The Leidos Internal Audit department has a multi-year risk based Audit Plan. The Audit Plan focuses on Financial, Business Operations, Corporate Functions, Information Technology & Security controls to ensure compliance with Leidos policies and procedures. Risks are continuously monitored and the Audit Plan is adjusted accordingly. The multi-year Audit Plan covers U.S. as well as international operations.

205-2

Communication and training about anti-corruption policies and procedures:

• Total number and percentage of governance body members that the organization’s anti-corruption policies and procedures have been communicated to, broken down by region.
• Total number and percentage of employees that the organization’s anti-corruption policies and procedures have been communicated to, broken down by employee category and region.
• Total number and percentage of business partners that the organization’s anti-corruption policies and procedures have been communicated to, broken down by type of business partner and region. Describe if the organization’s anti-corruption policies and procedures have been communicated to any other persons or organizations.
• Total number and percentage of governance body members that have received training on anti-corruption, broken down by region.
• Total number and percentage of employees that have received training on anti-corruption, broken down by employee category and region.

Ethics and Compliance

205-3

Confirmed incidents of corruption and actions taken:

• Total number and nature of confirmed incidents of corruption.
• Total number of confirmed incidents in which employees were dismissed or disciplined for corruption.
• Total number of confirmed incidents when contracts with business partners were terminated or not renewed due to violations related to corruption.
• Public legal cases regarding corruption brought against the organization or its employees during the reporting period and the outcomes of such cases.

None

415-1

Political contributions:

• Total monetary value of financial and in-kind political contributions made directly and indirectly by the organization by country and recipient/beneficiary.
• If applicable, how the monetary value of in-kind contributions was estimated.

For calendar year 2019, the Leidos Political Action Committee (L-PAC) made $653,000 in political contributions. No in-kind contributions were made. No political contributions were made to state and local candidates and committees and all L-PAC contributions were made within the United States.

206-1

Legal actions for anti-competitive behavior, anti-trust, and monopoly practices:

• Number of legal actions pending or completed during the reporting period regarding anti-competitive behavior and violations of anti-trust and monopoly legislation in which the organization has been identified as a participant.
• Main outcomes of completed legal actions, including any decisions or judgments.

None

419-1

Non-compliance with laws and regulations in the social and economic area:

• Significant fines and non-monetary sanctions for non-compliance with laws and/or regulations in the social and economic area in terms of:
  • total monetary value of significant fines;
  • total number of non-monetary sanctions;
  • Cases brought through dispute resolution mechanisms.
• If the organization has not identified any non-compliance with laws and/or regulations, a brief statement of this fact is sufficient.
• The context against which significant fines and non-monetary sanctions were incurred.

None

Ethics and Compliance

418-1

Substantiated complaints concerning breaches of customer privacy and losses of customer data:

• Total number of substantiated complaints received concerning breaches of customer privacy, categorized by:
  • complaints received from outside parties and substantiated by the organization;
  • complaints from regulatory bodies.
• Total number of identified leaks, thefts, or losses of customer data.
• If the organization has not identified any substantiated complaints, a brief statement of this fact is sufficient.

None

Trust Center > Data Privacy