GRI™ Index

During 2016, Leidos business was aligned into four segments:

• National Security Solutions (Surveillance & Reconnaissance; Integrated Systems; Global Services)
• Information Systems & Global Solutions (Enterprise IT Services; Software Development & Integrated Systems; Cybersecurity; Data Analytics; Air Traffic Management; Health Management Services; Energy Management & Operations; Acquisition, Program Management & Logistics)
• Health (Federal Health; Commercial Health; Life Sciences) and Infrastructure (Security Products; Power Grid Engineering; Federal Environmental & Engineering; Transaction & Valuation Consulting)
• Corporate and Other

List all entities included in the organization’s consolidated financial statements or equivalent documents.

Report whether any entity included in the organization’s consolidated financial statements or equivalent documents is not covered by the report.

Explain the process for defining the report content and the Aspect Boundaries.

Explain how the organization has implemented the Reporting Principles for Defining Report Content.

GRI Standards Index

About Our Reporting

Explanation  of  the  material  topic  and  its  Boundary

An  explanation  of  why  the  topic  is  material;

• The  Boundary  for  the  material  topic,  which  includes  a  description  of where  the  impacts  occur;  the  organization’s  involvement  with  the  impacts.  For  example,  whether  the  organization  has  caused  or  contributed  to  the  impacts,  or  is  directly  linked  to  the  impacts  through  its  business  relationships
• Report any specific limitation regarding the Aspect Boundary within the organization

The  management  approach  and  its  components

1. An explanation of how the organization manages the topic.

2. A  statement  of  the  purpose  of  the  management  approach.

3. A  description  of  the  following,  if  the  management  approach  includes  that  component:

   1. Policies;

   2. Commitments;

   3. Goals  and  targets; 

   4. Responsibilities;

   5.  Resources;

   6. Grievance  mechanisms; 

   7. Specific  actions, such  as processes, projects,  programs and initiatives

The claim made by the organization, if it has prepared a report in accordance with the GRI Standards, either:

• This report has been prepared in accordance with the GRI Standards: Core option;
• This report has been prepared in accordance with the GRI Standards: Comprehensive option;

The  GRI  content  index,  which  specifies  each  of  the  GRI  Standards  used  and  lists  all  disclosures  included  in  the  report. For  each  disclosure,  the  content  index  shall  include:

• The  number  of  the  disclosure  (for  disclosures  covered  by  the  GRI  Standards);
• The  page  number(s)  or  URL(s)  where  the  information  can  be  found,  either  within  the  report  or  in  other  published  materials;
• If  applicable,  and  where  permitted,  the  reason(s)  for  omission  when  a  required  disclosure  cannot  be  made.

A  description  of  the  organization’s  policy  and  current  practice  with  regard  to  seeking  external  assurance  for  the  report.

If  the  report  has  been  externally  assured:

• A reference to the external assurance report, statements, or opinions.  If  not  included  in  the  assurance  report  accompanying  the  sustainability  report,  a  description  of  what  has  and  what  has  not  been  assured  and  on  what  basis,  including  the  assurance  standards  used,  the  level  of  assurance  obtained,  and  any  limitations  of  the  assurance  process;
• The  relationship  between  the  organization  and  the  assurance  provider;
• Whether  and  how  the  highest  governance  body  or  senior  executives are  involved  in  seeking  external  assurance  for  the  organization’s  sustainability  report.

Governance  structure  of  the  organization,  including  committees  of  the  highest  governance  body.

Committees  responsible  for  decision-making  on  economic,  environmental,  and  social  topics.

Leidos is governed by a board of directors comprising thirteen directors, twelve of which are independent directors as defined by the New York Stock Exchange and corporate governance guidelines. The board includes seven standing committees, including an Ethics and Corporate Responsibility Committee, chartered with

• Review the Company’s policies and practices in the areas of corporate responsibility including, but not limited to, safety and protection of the environment.
• Monitor the Company’s policies and practices with respect to contributions to charitable, educational and other tax-exempt organizations.
• Review the Company’s policies and practices with respect to political contributions, government relations and political action committees.
• Review such political, social and environmental issues that may affect the business operations, performance, business continuity crisis planning, and public image or reputation of the Company, as determined to be appropriate and consistent with the role of this Committee.

A description  of  internal  and  external  mechanisms  for:

• Seeking  advice  about  ethical  and  lawful  behavior,  and  organizational  integrity;
• Reporting  concerns  about  unethical  or  unlawful  behavior,  and  organizational  integrity.

Direct economic value generated and distributed:

Direct  economic  value  generated  and  distributed  (EVG&D)  on  an  accruals  basis,  including  the  basic  components  for  the  organization’s  global  operations  as  listed  below.  If  data  are  presented  on  a  cash  basis,  report  the  justification  for  this  decision  in  addition  to  reporting  the  following  basic  components:

Direct  economic  value  generated:  revenues;

Economic  value  distributed:  operating  costs,  employee  wages  and  benefits,  payments  to  providers  of  capital,  payments  to  government  by  country,  and  community  investments;

Economic  value  retained:  ‘direct  economic  value  generated’  less  ‘economic  value  distributed’.

Where  significant,  report  EVG&D  separately  at  country,  regional,  or  market  levels,  and  the  criteria  used  for  defining  significance.

See 2017 Annual Report

Community > Corporate Philanthropy

Financial implications and other risks and opportunities for the organization's activities due to climate change:

Report risks and opportunities posed by climate change that have the potential to generate substantive changes in operations, revenue or expenditure, including:

• A description of the risk or opportunity and its classification as either physical, regulatory, or other
• A description of the impact associated with the risk or opportunity
• The financial implications of the risk or opportunity before action is taken
• The methods used to manage the risk or opportunity
• The costs of actions taken to manage the risk or opportunity

Relative to Leidos corporate revenue generation and overhead support operations, typical physical operating risks associated with climate change include a greater propensity for severe weather events such as tornadoes, hurricanes/flash flooding, blizzards/ice storms, extreme heat, drought and gradual sea level rise/continental sinking. There are no significant regulatory or other climate change induced risk or opportunities.

• Potential physical risks associated with events fostered by climate change are worksite displacement and personal inconvenience where impacted work locations are temporarily out of operation and/or employees residing in an impacted area suffer damage to their homes temporarily redirecting personal priorities away from career objectives to focus on restoring one's personal life as quickly as possible.
• During the time that Leidos operating locations are out-of-operation and/or employees are unable to work due to the need to recover from impacts to restore their personal lives, work-related productivity, and therefore revenue generation, may be adversely impacted in specific locales for specific program activities.
• The Leidos Crisis Management team routinely monitors projected and day-to-day weather conditions with the potential to adversely impact operating locations and employee residence locations for rapidly addressing any mitigation opportunities.
• Leidos spends approximately $500K/year to pay for third party products/services and employ the personnel who monitor and maintain the internal crisis management functions and systems.

Defined  benefit  plan  obligations  and  other  retirement  plans

If  the  plan’s  liabilities  are  met  by  the  organization’s  general  resources,  the  estimated  value  of  those  liabilities.

If  a  separate  fund  exists  to  pay  the  plan’s  pension  liabilities:

The  extent  to  which  the  scheme’s  liabilities  are  estimated  to  be  covered  by  the  assets  that  have  been  set  aside  to  meet  them;

The  basis  on  which  that  estimate  has  been  arrived  at;

When that estimate was made.

If  a  fund  set  up  to  pay  the  plan’s  pension  liabilities  is  not  fully  covered,  explain  the  strategy,  if  any,  adopted  by  the  employer  to  work  towards  full  coverage,  and  the  timescale,  if  any,  by  which  the  employer  hopes  to  achieve  full  coverage.

Percentage of salary contributed by employee or employer.

Level  of  participation  in  retirement  plans,  such  as  participation  in  mandatory  or  voluntary  schemes,  regional,  or  country-based  schemes,  or  those  with  financial  impact.

As of January 1, 2017, the Leidos Biomedical Research plan has 719 active participants, 547 deferred vested participants and 552 receiving pensions. This plan is approximately 99 percent funded as of January 1, 2017, on a stabilized funding basis. This plan is closed to future participants and as of January 1, 2017, only about 28 percent of active participants are still accruing benefits.

The second plan includes, as of July 1, 2017, approximately 177 deferred and 67 current pensioners. It is also closed to future participants, is sponsored by the Calanais Pension Trustee Co., Ltd., and is approximately 85 percent funded.

Energy consumption within the organization:

1. Total fuel consumption within the organization from non-renewable sources, in joules or multiples, and including fuel types used.
2. Total fuel consumption within the organization from renewable sources, in joules or multiples, and including fuel types used.
3. In joules, watt-hours or multiples, the total:
   1. electricity  consumption
   2. heating consumption
   3. cooling  consumption
   4. steam  consumption
4. In joules, watt-hours or multiples, the total:
   1. electricity sold
   2. heating sold
   3. cooling sold
   4. steam sold
5. Total energy consumption within the organization, in joules or multiples.
6. Standards, methodologies, assumptions, and/or calculation tools used.
7. Source of the conversion factors used.

Energy consumption outside of the organization:

1. Energy consumption outside of the organization, in joules or multiples.
2. Standards, methodologies, assumptions, and/or calculation tools used.
3. Source of the conversion factors used.

Energy intensity:

1. Energy intensity ratio for the organization.
2. Organization-specific metric (the denominator) chosen to calculate the ratio
3. Types of energy included in the intensity ratio; whether fuel, electricity, heating, cooling, steam, or all.
4. Whether the ratio uses energy consumption within the organization, outside of it, or both.

1. 95.7 kBtu/ft² (buildings energy only, fleet vehicle energy excluded)
2. Total owned and lease floor area is 7,263,807 ft² (Leidos-occupied floor area only, subleased floor area excluded)
3. Natural gas and electricity consumption in owned and leased buildings. Leidos does not purchase heating, cooling, steam, or any other fuels. Fleet vehicle fuel consumption is not captured because the base metric of the intensity ratio is floor area of buildings. Note that fleet vehicle fuel consumption accounts for less than 2% of total energy.
4. All reported energy is consumed within the organization.

Reduction of energy consumption:

1. Amount of reductions in energy consumption achieved as a direct result of conservation and efficiency initiatives, in joules or multiples.
2. Types of energy included in the reductions; whether fuel, electricity, heating, cooling, steam, or all.
3. Basis for calculating reductions in energy consumption, such as base year or baseline, including the rationale for choosing it.

• Standards, methodologies, assumptions, and/or calculation tools used.

Direct greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (Scope 1):

1. Gross direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions in metric tons of CO₂ equivalent.
2. Gases included in the calculation; whether CO₂, CH₄, N₂O, HFCs, PFCs, SF₆, NF₃, or all.
3. Biogenic CO₂ emissions in metric tons of CO₂ equivalent.
4. Base year for the calculation, if applicable, including:
   1. the rationale for choosing it;
   2. emissions in the base year;
   3. the context for any significant changes in emissions that triggered recalculations of base year emissions.
5. Source of the emission factors and the global warming potential (GWP) rates used, or a reference to the GWP source.
6. Consolidation approach for emissions; whether equity share, financial control, or operational control.
7. Standards, methodologies, assumptions, and/or calculation tools used.

Energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions:

1. Gross location-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions in metric tons of CO₂ equivalent.
2. If applicable, gross market-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions in metric tons of CO₂ equivalent.
3. If available, the gases included in the calculation; whether CO₂, CH₄, N₂O, HFCs, PFCs, SF₆, NF₃, or all.
4. Base year for the calculation, if applicable, including:
   1. the rationale for choosing it;
   2. emissions in the base year;
   3. the context for any significant changes in emissions that triggered recalculations of base year emissions.
5. Source of the emission factors and the global warming potential (GWP) rates used, or a reference to the GWP source.
6. Consolidation approach for emissions; whether equity share, financial control, or operational control.
7. Standards, methodologies, assumptions, and/or calculation tools used.

Other indirect greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (Scope 3):

1. Gross other indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions in metric tons of CO₂ equivalent.
2. If available, the gases included in the calculation; whether CO₂, CH₄, N₂O, HFCs, PFCs, SF₆, NF₃, or all.
3. Biogenic CO₂ emissions in metric tons of CO₂ equivalent.
4. Other indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions categories and activities included in the calculation.
5. Base year for the calculation, if applicable, including:

1. the rationale for choosing it;
2. ii. emissions in the base year;
3. the context for any significant changes in emissions that triggered recalculations of base year emissions.

6. Source of the emission factors and the global warming potential (GWP) rates used, or a reference to the GWP source.

Standards, methodologies, assumptions, and/or calculation tools used.

Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity:

1. GHG emissions intensity ratio for the organization.
2. Organization-specific metric (the denominator) chosen to calculate the ratio.
3. Types of GHG emissions included in the intensity ratio; whether direct (Scope 1), energy indirect (Scope 2), and/or other indirect (Scope 3).
4. Gases included in the calculation; whether CO₂, CH₄, N₂O, HFCs, PFCs, SF₆, NF₃, or all.

1. 9.7 kgCO2e/ft2 (market-based)
2. Total owned and lease floor area is 7,263,807 ft² (Leidos-occupied floor area only, subleased floor area excluded)

3. INCLUDED: Scope 1 GHG emissions from natural gas combustion for heating, diesel fuel combustion in generators, and fugitive refrigerants from owned large air conditioning and refrigeration equipment. Also, market-based Scope 2 GHG emissions from purchased electricity and purchased natural gas heating in full service leases. EXCLUDED: Scope 1 GHG emissions from fleet vehicles and Scope 3 GHG emissions from employee commuting and business travel are not captured in the emissions intensity ratio, because the base metric is building floor area.

4. All gases are included; however, Leidos activities do not generate any PFCs, SF₆, NF₃.

Reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions:

1. GHG emissions reduced as a direct result of reduction initiatives, in metric tons of CO2 equivalent.
2. Gases included in the calculation; whether CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs, PFCs, SF6, NF3, or all.
3. Base year or baseline, including the rationale for choosing it.
4. Scopes in which reductions took place; whether direct (Scope 1), energy indirect (Scope 2), and/or other indirect (Scope 3).
5. Standards, methodologies, assumptions, and/or calculation tools used.

1. 4,332 mtCO2e
2. CO2, CH4, N2O. Reduction initiatives did not affect any other GHGs.
3. 2016 was selected as the base year for GHG reductions reported in this section to evaluate year-over-year improvements.
4. Scope 1 and Scope 2 only.
5. GHG emissions were reduced as a direct result of three initiatives: elimination of under-performing real estate assets, renewable energy purchases, and energy efficiency improvements.The GHG reduction from eliminated real estate was assumed proportional to the reduction of Leidos-occupied floor area from 2016 to 2017 (-3.9%). The GHG reduction from increased renewable energy purchases were determined by multiplying increase in renewable purchases (in kWh) from 2016 to 2017 by the eGRID emission factors for the sub-region in which the purchasing facilities operate.The GHG reduction from energy efficiency improvements were determined by multiplying the projected annual energy savings (in kWh) of each project by the eGRID emission factors for the sub-region in which each project was completed.

Total weight of waste by type and disposal method:

Report the total weight of hazardous and non-hazardous waste, by the following disposal methods:

• Reuse
• Recycling
• Composting
• Recovery, including energy recovery
• Incineration (mass burn)
• Deep well injection
• Landfill
• On-site storage
• Other (to be specified by the organization)

Report how the waste disposal method has been determined:

• Disposed of directly by the organization or otherwise directly confirmed
• Information provided by the waste disposal contractor
• Organizational defaults of the waste disposal contractor

Leidos has national contracts with professional waste management companies for recycling and waste disposal at all owned facilities. Total recycling and compost waste details are provided in the Environment > Corporate Footprint and Environmental Stewardship section.

Leidos disposes of hazardous waste using Clean Harbors Environmental Services. In all cases, we are considered a small quantity generator per US EPA (less than 1,000 kilograms of hazardous waste per month). The waste is generally landfilled or incinerated at an EPA-permitted hazardous waste Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility (TSDF), as reported to Leidos by Clean Harbors Environmental Services.

New  suppliers  that  were  screened  using  environmental  criteria

Negative  environmental  impacts  in  the  supply  chain  and  actions  taken:

1. Number of suppliers assessed for environmental impacts.
2. Number  of  suppliers  identified  as  having  significant  actual  and  potential  negative  environmental  impacts.
3. Significant  actual  and  potential  negative  environmental  impacts  identified  in  the  supply  chain.
4. Percentage  of  suppliers  identified  as  having  significant  actual  and  potential  negative  environmental  impacts  with  which  improvements  were  agreed  upon  as  a  result  of  assessment.
5. Percentage  of  suppliers  identified  as  having  significant  actual  and  potential  negative  environmental  impacts  with  which  relationships  were  terminated  as  a  result  of  assessment,  and  why..

1. None
2. None
3. None
4. 0 %
5. 0%

Types  of  injury  and  rates  of  injury,  occupational  diseases, lost  days,  and  absenteeism,  and  number  of  work-related  fatalities:

1.  Types  of  injury,  injury  rate  (IR),  occupational  disease  rate  (ODR),  lost  day  rate  (LDR),  absentee  rate  (AR),  and  work-related  fatalities,  for  all  employees,  with  a  breakdown  by:
   1. Region;
   2. Gender.
2. Types  of  injury,  injury  rate  (IR),  and  work-related  fatalities,  for  all  workers  (excluding  employees)  whose  work,  or  workplace,  is  controlled  by  the  organization,  with  a  breakdown  by:
   1. Region;
   2. Gender.
3. The  system  of  rules  applied  in  recording  and  reporting  accident  statistics.

Leidos reports for the company's overall injury rate by total workforce only (vs. by gender or region).

Environment > Environmental-health-and-safety

Programs  for  upgrading  employee  skills  and  transition assistance  programs:

1. Type  and  scope  of  programs  implemented  and  assistance  provided  to  upgrade  employee  skills.
2. Transition  assistance  programs  provided  to  facilitate  continued  employability  and  the  management  of  career  endings  resulting  from  retirement  or  termination  of  employment..

Diversity  of  governance  bodies  and  employees:

• Percentage  of  individuals  within  the  organization’s  governance  bodies  in  each  of  the  following  diversity  categories:
  • Gender;
  • Age  group:  under  30  years  old,  30-50  years  old,  over  50  years  old;
  • Other  indicators  of  diversity  where  relevant  (such  as  minority  or  vulnerable  groups).
• Percentage  of  employees  per  employee  category in  each  of  the  following  diversity  categories:
  • Gender;
  • Age  group:  under  30  years  old,  30-50  years  old,  over  50  years  old;
  • Other  indicators  of  diversity  where  relevant  (such  as  minority  or  vulnerable  groups).

For governance composition, see 102-18 response.

People > Employee Demographics and Statistics

New  suppliers  that  were  screened  using  social  criteria

Negative  social  impacts  in  the  supply  chain  and  actions  taken:

1. Number of suppliers assessed for social impacts.
2. Number  of  suppliers  identified  as  having  significant  actual  and  potential  negative  social  impacts.
3. Significant  actual  and  potential  negative  social  impacts  identified  in  the  supply  chain.
4. Percentage  of  suppliers  identified  as  having  significant  actual  and  potential  negative  social  impacts  with  which  improvements  were  agreed  upon  as  a  result  of  assessment.
5. Percentage  of  suppliers  identified  as  having  significant  actual  and  potential  negative  social  impacts  with  which  relationships  were  terminated  as  a  result  of  assessment,  and  why..

Supplier and Small Business Relationships

Ethics and Compliance

Operations  with  local  community  engagement,  impact  assessments,  and  development  programs:

• Percentage  of  operations  with  implemented  local  community  engagement,  impact  assessments,  and/or  development  programs,  including  the  use  of:
  • Social  impact  assessments,  including  gender  impact  assessments,  based  on  participatory  processes;
  • Environmental  impact  assessments  and  ongoing  monitoring;
  • Public  disclosure  of  results  of  environmental  and  social  impact  assessments;
  • Local  community  development  programs  based  on  local  communities’  needs;
  • Stakeholder  engagement  plans  based  on  stakeholder  mapping;
  • Broad  based  local  community  consultation  committees  and  processes  that  include  vulnerable  groups;
  • Works  councils,  occupational  health  and  safety  committees  and  other  worker  representation  bodies  to  deal  with  impacts;
  • Formal local community grievance processes that  include  vulnerable  groups;
  • Works  councils,  occupational  health  and  safety  committees  and  other  worker  representation  bodies  to  deal  with  impacts;
  • Formal local community grievance processes 

Leidos does not currently track this metric. Most of our locations, however, engage in outreach within their communities. Included in this report are several examples of our efforts in both specific communities and amongst specific populations, as well as our community engagement priority areas. We believe that these programs and activities are effective, yet continue to look for ways to maximize their positive effects and minimize any negative impacts.

Community

Community > Corporate Philanthropy

Operations  assessed  for  risks  related  to  corruption:

• Total  number  and  percentage  of  operations  assessed  for  risks  related  to  corruption.
• Significant  risks  related  to  corruption  identified  through  the  risk  assessment..

Communication  and  training  about  anti-corruption  policies  and  procedures:

• Total  number  and  percentage  of  governance  body  members  that  the  organization’s  anti-corruption  policies  and  procedures  have  been  communicated  to,  broken  down  by  region.
• Total  number  and  percentage  of  employees  that  the  organization’s  anti-corruption  policies  and  procedures  have  been  communicated  to,  broken  down  by  employee  category  and  region.
• Total  number  and  percentage  of  business  partners  that  the  organization’s  anti-corruption  policies  and  procedures  have  been  communicated  to,  broken  down  by  type  of  business  partner  and  region.  Describe  if  the  organization’s  anti-corruption  policies  and  procedures  have  been  communicated  to  any  other  persons  or  organizations.
• Total  number  and  percentage  of  governance  body  members  that  have  received  training  on  anti-corruption,  broken  down  by  region.
• Total  number  and  percentage  of  employees  that  have  received  training  on  anti-corruption,  broken  down  by  employee  category  and  region..

Confirmed incidents of corruption and actions taken:

• Total  number  and  nature  of  confirmed  incidents  of  corruption.
• Total  number  of  confirmed  incidents  in  which  employees  were  dismissed  or  disciplined  for  corruption.
• Total  number  of  confirmed  incidents  when  contracts  with  business  partners  were  terminated  or  not  renewed  due  to  violations  related  to  corruption.
• Public  legal  cases  regarding  corruption  brought  against  the  organization  or  its  employees  during  the  reporting  period  and  the  outcomes  of  such  cases..

Political  contributions:

• Total  monetary  value  of  financial  and  in-kind  political  contributions  made  directly  and  indirectly by  the  organization  by  country  and  recipient/beneficiary.
• If  applicable,  how  the  monetary  value  of  in-kind  contributions  was  estimated..

Legal  actions  for  anti-competitive  behavior,  anti-trust,  and  monopoly  practices:

• Number  of  legal  actions  pending  or  completed  during  the  reporting  period  regarding  anti-competitive  behavior  and  violations  of  anti-trust  and  monopoly  legislation  in  which  the  organization  has  been  identified  as  a  participant.
• Main  outcomes  of  completed  legal  actions,  including  any  decisions  or  judgments.

Non-compliance  with  laws  and  regulations  in  the  social and  economic  area:

• Significant  fines  and  non-monetary  sanctions  for  non-compliance  with  laws  and/or  regulations  in  the  social  and  economic  area  in  terms  of:
  • total  monetary  value  of  significant  fines;
  • total  number  of  non-monetary  sanctions;
  • Cases brought through dispute resolution mechanisms.
• If  the  organization  has  not  identified  any  non-compliance  with  laws  and/or  regulations,  a  brief  statement  of  this  fact  is  sufficient.
• The  context  against  which  significant  fines  and  non-monetary  sanctions  were  incurred..

None

Ethics and Compliance

Substantiated  complaints  concerning  breaches  of  customer privacy  and  losses  of  customer  data:

• Total  number  of  substantiated  complaints  received  concerning  breaches  of  customer  privacy,  categorized  by:
  • complaints  received  from  outside  parties  and  substantiated  by  the  organization;
  • Complaints from regulatory bodies.
• Total  number  of  identified  leaks,  thefts,  or  losses  of  customer  data.
• If  the  organization  has  not  identified  any  substantiated  complaints,  a  brief  statement  of  this  fact  is  sufficient.

None

Ethics and Compliance > Data Privacy

Non-compliance  with  laws  and  regulations  in  the  social and  economic  area:

• Significant  fines  and  non-monetary  sanctions  for  non-compliance  with  laws  and/or  regulations  in  the  social  and  economic  area  in  terms  of:
  • total  monetary  value  of  significant  fines;
  • total  number  of  non-monetary  sanctions;
  • Cases brought through dispute resolution mechanisms.
• If  the  organization  has  not  identified  any  non-compliance  with  laws  and/or  regulations,  a  brief  statement  of  this  fact  is  sufficient.
• The  context  against  which  significant  fines  and  non-monetary  sanctions  were  incurred..

None

Ethics and Compliance

Substantiated  complaints  concerning  breaches  of  customer privacy  and  losses  of  customer  data:

• Total  number  of  substantiated  complaints  received  concerning  breaches  of  customer  privacy,  categorized  by:
  • complaints  received  from  outside  parties  and  substantiated  by  the  organization;
  • Complaints from regulatory bodies.
• Total  number  of  identified  leaks,  thefts,  or  losses  of  customer  data.
• If  the  organization  has  not  identified  any  substantiated  complaints,  a  brief  statement  of  this  fact  is  sufficient.

None

Ethics and Compliance > Data Privacy