GRI™ G4 Index

The Leidos 2016 Corporate Responsibility Report is published in accordance with the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI™) G4 Sustainability Reporting Framework (Core option). The G4 guidelines eliminate scoring and emphasize materiality. The following index lists our responses to the G4 Core option (General Standard Disclosures and Specific Standard Disclosures for aspects deemed material) and provides links to relevant report content on Leidos.com where appropriate.

Note: For each specific standard disclosure aspect, Disclosures on Management Approach are contained in relevant sections on Leidos.com, including how Leidos manages each material aspect, any associated impacts, and related evaluations of management approach, where applicable.

General Standard Disclosures

General Standard Disclosures are applicable to all organizations preparing sustainability reports. They cover corporate strategy and profile, governance and ethics, as well as detail about our approach to reporting.

G4 Indicator	G4 Disclosure Requirements	2016 Response
G4-1	Statement from the most senior decision-maker of the organization (such as CEO, chair, or equivalent senior position).	CEO Message
G4-2	Provide a description of key impacts, risks, and opportunities.	Executive Summary

G4 Indicator	G4 Disclosure Requirements	2016 Response
G4-3	Report the organization name.	Leidos
G4-4	Report the primary brands, products, and services.	During 2016, Leidos business was aligned into four segments: National Security Solutions (Surveillance & Reconnaissance; Integrated Systems; Global Services) Information Systems & Global Solutions (Enterprise IT Services; Software Development & Integrated Systems; Cybersecurity; Data Analytics; Air Traffic Management; Health Management Services; Energy Management & Operations; Acquisition, Program Management & Logistics) Health (Federal Health; Commercial Health; Life Sciences) and Infrastructure (Security Products; Power Grid Engineering; Federal Environmental & Engineering; Transaction & Valuation Consulting) Corporate and Other
G4-5	Report the location of the organization's headquarters.	11955 Freedom Drive Reston, VA 20190
G4-6	Report the number of countries where the organization operates.	People > Employee Demographics and Statistics
G4-7	Report the nature of ownership and legal form.	Corporation (LDOS)
G4-8	Report the markets served.	2016 Annual Report, Part II
G4-9	Report the scale of the organization (total number of employees, operations, net sales, total capitalization, quantity of products/services provided).	Approximately 32,000 employees worldwide (as of the end of December 2016) Three reportable business segments (National Security Solutions; Health and Infrastructure; Corporate and Other). $7.043B fiscal year ended December 30, 2016. See 2016 Annual Report
G4-10	Report employee demographics.	People > Employee Demographics and Statistics
G4-11	Report percentage of total employees covered by collective bargaining.	Currently, 1.5% of Leidos employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements.
G4-12	Describe the organization's supply chain.	Supplier and Small Business Relationships
G4-13	Report any significant changes during the reporting period regarding the organization’s size, structure, ownership, or its supply chain.	On August 16, 2016, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Leidos Holdings, Inc. merged with the Information Systems & Global Solutions business of Lockheed Martin Corporation in a Reverse Morris Trust transaction. For additional details, see 2016 Annual Report
G4-14	Report whether and how the precautionary approach or principle is addressed by the organization.	Leidos maintains a corporate-level Enterprise Risk Management Council (ERMC) to review business activities that present, or have the potential to present, significant risk to the company. Risks and their mitigation plans are identified by relevant operating units and functions. The ERMC reviews those plans to ensure that necessary actions are implemented to avoid, mitigate, and manage those risks and that the steps taken are in-line with the company’s overall risk tolerance.
G4-15	List externally developed economic, environmental and social charters, principles, or other initiatives to which the organization subscribes or which it endorses.	The Leidos corporate responsibility report is developed in compliance with the GRI G4 Reporting Framework. Additionally, Leidos subject matter experts participate in a number of collaborative efforts with stakeholders and external organizations.
G4-16	List memberships of associations (such as industry associations) and national or international advocacy organizations in which the organization.	Leidos participates in numerous professional industry associations and community/non-profit organizations related to all aspects of our business and the communities in which employees live and work, respectively. Leidos employees hold leadership positions in many of these organizations is involved.

G4 Indicator	G4 Disclosure Requirements	2016 Response
G4-17	List all entities included in the organization’s consolidated financial statements or equivalent documents. Report whether any entity included in the organization’s consolidated financial statements or equivalent documents is not covered by the report.	See 2016 Annual Report
G4-18	Explain the process for defining the report content and the Aspect Boundaries. Explain how the organization has implemented the Reporting Principles for Defining Report Content.	About Our Reporting
G4-19	List all the material Aspects identified in the process for defining report content.	About Our Reporting
G4-20	For each material Aspect, report the Aspect Boundary within the organization, as follows: Report whether the Aspect is material within the organization If the Aspect is not material for all entities within the organization (as described in G4-17), select one of the following two approaches and report either: The list of entities or groups of entities included in G4-17 for which the Aspect is not material or The list of entities or groups of entities included in G4-17 for which the Aspects is material Report any specific limitation regarding the Aspect Boundary within the organization	All statements regarding our core values and commitment to data privacy, ethics, and integrity apply to the entire enterprise. References to numbers of employees and associated metrics apply to the entire enterprise, except where noted otherwise. Most employee benefit programs addressed within this report relate to Leidos U.S. operations, which make up the preponderance of our workforce, and may exclude certain U.S. subsidiaries. In keeping with our workforce distributions, this report highlights activities within our U.S. operations, including subsidiaries and leased facilities, while presenting selected data on our worldwide enterprise. Information about our business and financial performance, reported pursuant to our fiscal year ended December, 2016, is provided in our 2016 Annual Report
G4-21	For each material Aspect, report the Aspect Boundary outside the organization, as follows: Report whether the Aspect is material outside of the organization If the Aspect is material outside of the organization, identify the entities, groups of entities or elements for which the Aspect is material. In addition, describe the geographical location where the Aspect is material for the entities identified Report any specific limitation regarding the Aspect Boundary outside the organization	See response to G4-20 above. Leidos reports Aspects that are deemed material and provides supporting data to the greatest extent available. Aspect boundaries are discussed in the Disclosures on Management Approach (DMAs) for each aspect, but are generally limited to the stakeholders that are directly impacted or influenced by the aspect.
G4-22	Report the effect of any restatements of information provided in previous reports, and the reasons for such restatements.	This report contains no restatements of previously published Leidos corporate responsibility reports.
G4-23	Report significant changes from previous reporting periods in the Scope and Aspect Boundaries.	This report contains no significant changes to scope, boundary, or measurement methods used in previously published corporate responsibility reports.

G4 Indicator	G4 Disclosure Requirements	2016 Response
G4-24	Provide a list of stakeholder groups engaged by the organization.	About Our Reporting
G4-25	Report the basis for identification and selection of stakeholders with whom to engage.	About Our Reporting
G4-26	Report the organization’s approach to stakeholder engagement, including frequency of engagement by type and by stakeholder group, and an indication of whether any of the engagement was undertaken specifically as part of the report preparation process.	About Our Reporting
G4-27	Report key topics and concerns that have been raised through stakeholder engagement, and how the organization has responded to those key topics and concerns, including through its reporting. Report the stakeholder groups that raised each of the key topics and concerns.	This is addressed with the relevant Aspect reported.

G4 Indicator	G4 Disclosure Requirements	2016 Response
G4-28	Reporting period (such as fiscal or calendar year) for information provided.	Calendar year 2016.
G4-29	Date of most recent previous report (if any).	Fall, 2016 (covering the period calendar year 2015).
G4-30	Reporting cycle (such as annual, biennial).	Annual.
G4-31	Provide the contact point for questions regarding the report or its contents.	Michael P. Coogan, Vice President, Director, Corporate Responsibility.
G4-32	Report the ‘in accordance’ option the organization has chosen. Report the GRI Content Index for the chosen option. Report the reference to the External Assurance Report, if the report has been externally assured. GRI recommends the use of external assurance but it is not a requirement to be ‘in accordance’ with the Guidelines.	In Accordance, Core Leidos reports are not currently externally assured.
G4-33	Report the organization’s policy and current practice with regard to seeking external assurance for the report. If not included in the assurance report accompanying the sustainability report, report the scope and basis of any external assurance provided. Report the relationship between the organization and the assurance providers. Report whether the highest governance body or senior executives are involved in seeking assurance for the organization’s sustainability report.	Leidos does not currently seek external assurance for its reporting, although several individual metrics, specifically regarding the company's environmental performance (e.g., The Climate Registry), are prepared and/or defined and verified by outside parties.

G4 Indicator	G4 Disclosure Requirements	2016 Response
G4-34	Report the governance structure of the organization, including committees of the highest governance body. Identify any committees responsible for decision-making on economic, environmental and social impacts.	Leidos is governed by a board of directors comprising thirteen directors, twelve of which are independent directors as defined by the New York Stock Exchange and corporate governance guidelines. The board includes seven standing committees, including an Ethics and Corporate Responsibility Committee, chartered with Review the Company’s policies and practices in the areas of corporate responsibility including, but not limited to, safety and protection of the environment. Monitor the Company’s policies and practices with respect to contributions to charitable, educational and other tax-exempt organizations. Review the Company’s policies and practices with respect to political contributions, government relations and political action committees. Review such political, social and environmental issues that may affect the business operations, performance, business continuity crisis planning, and public image or reputation of the Company, as determined to be appropriate and consistent with the role of this Committee.

G4 Indicator

G4 Disclosure Requirements

2016 Response

G4-34

Report the governance structure of the organization, including committees of the highest governance body. Identify any committees responsible for decision-making on economic, environmental and social impacts.

Leidos is governed by a board of directors comprising thirteen directors, twelve of which are independent directors as defined by the New York Stock Exchange and corporate governance guidelines. The board includes seven standing committees, including an Ethics and Corporate Responsibility Committee, chartered with

Review the Company’s policies and practices in the areas of corporate responsibility including, but not limited to, safety and protection of the environment.
Monitor the Company’s policies and practices with respect to contributions to charitable, educational and other tax-exempt organizations.
Review the Company’s policies and practices with respect to political contributions, government relations and political action committees.
Review such political, social and environmental issues that may affect the business operations, performance, business continuity crisis planning, and public image or reputation of the Company, as determined to be appropriate and consistent with the role of this Committee.

G4 Indicator	G4 Disclosure Requirements	2016 Response
G4-56	Describe the organization’s values, principles, standards and norms of behavior such as codes of conduct and codes of ethics.	Ethics and Compliance
G4-57	Report the internal and external mechanisms for seeking advice on ethical and lawful behavior, and matters related to organizational integrity, such as helplines or advice lines.	Ethics and Compliance
G4-58	Report the internal and external mechanisms for reporting concerns about unethical or unlawful behavior, and matters related to organizational integrity, such as escalation through line management, whistleblowing mechanisms or hotlines.	Ethics and Compliance

Specific Standard Disclosures

Specific Standard Disclosures are Disclosures on Management Approach (DMA) and Indicators. They are presented as Aspects under three Categories — Economic, Environmental and Social.

Economic

G4 Indicator	G4 Disclosure Requirements	2016 Response
G4-EC1	Direct economic value generated and distributed: Report the direct economic value generated and distributed (EVG&D) on an accruals basis including the basic components for the organization’s global operations. To better assess local economic impacts, report EVG&D separately at country, regional, or market levels, where significant. Report the criteria used for defining significance.	See 2016 Annual Report Community > Corporate Philanthropy
G4-EC2	Financial implications and other risks and opportunities for the organization's activities due to climate change: Report risks and opportunities posed by climate change that have the potential to generate substantive changes in operations, revenue or expenditure, including: A description of the risk or opportunity and its classification as either physical, regulatory, or other A description of the impact associated with the risk or opportunity The financial implications of the risk or opportunity before action is taken The methods used to manage the risk or opportunity The costs of actions taken to manage the risk or opportunity	Relative to Leidos corporate revenue generation and overhead support operations, typical physical operating risks associated with climate change include a greater propensity for severe weather events such as tornadoes, hurricanes/flash flooding, blizzards/ice storms, extreme heat, drought and gradual sea level rise/continental sinking. There are no significant regulatory or other climate change induced risk or opportunities. Potential physical risks associated with events fostered by climate change are worksite displacement and personal inconvenience where impacted work locations are temporarily out of operation and/or employees residing in an impacted area suffer damage to their homes temporarily redirecting personal priorities away from career objectives to focus on restoring one's personal life as quickly as possible. During the time that Leidos operating locations are out-of-operation and/or employees are unable to work due to the need to recover from impacts to restore their personal lives, work-related productivity, and therefore revenue generation, may be adversely impacted in specific locales for specific program activities. The Leidos Crisis Management team routinely monitors projected and day-to-day weather conditions with the potential to adversely impact operating locations and employee residence locations for rapidly addressing any mitigation opportunities. Leidos spends approximately $500K/year to pay for third party products/services and employ the personnel who monitor and maintain the internal crisis management functions and systems.
G4-EC3	Where the plan’s liabilities are met by the organization’s general resources, report the estimated value of those liabilities. Where a separate fund exists to pay the plan’s pension liabilities, report: The extent to which the scheme’s liabilities are estimated to be covered by the assets that have been set aside to meet them The basis on which that estimate has been arrived at When that estimate was made Where a fund set up to pay the plan’s pension liabilities is not fully covered, explain the strategy, if any, adopted by the employer to work towards full coverage, and the timescale, if any, by which the employer hopes to achieve full coverage. Report the percentage of salary contributed by employee or employer. Report the level of participation in retirement plans (such as participation in mandatory or voluntary schemes, regional or country-based schemes, or those with financial impact).	As of January 1, 2017, the Leidos Biomedical Research plan has 719 active participants, 547 deferred vested participants and 552 receiving pensions. This plan is approximately 99 percent funded as of January 1, 2017, on a stabilized funding basis. This plan is closed to future participants and as of January 1, 2017, only about 28 percent of active participants are still accruing benefits. The second plan includes, as of July 1, 2017, approximately 177 deferred and 67 current pensioners. It is also closed to future participants, is sponsored by the Calanais Pension Trustee Co., Ltd., and is approximately 85 percent funded.

G4 Indicator

G4 Disclosure Requirements

2016 Response

G4-EC1

Direct economic value generated and distributed:

Report the direct economic value generated and distributed (EVG&D) on an accruals basis including the basic components for the organization’s global operations.

To better assess local economic impacts, report EVG&D separately at country, regional, or market levels, where significant. Report the criteria used for defining significance.

See 2016 Annual Report

Community > Corporate Philanthropy

G4-EC2

Financial implications and other risks and opportunities for the organization's activities due to climate change:

Report risks and opportunities posed by climate change that have the potential to generate substantive changes in operations, revenue or expenditure, including:

A description of the risk or opportunity and its classification as either physical, regulatory, or other
A description of the impact associated with the risk or opportunity
The financial implications of the risk or opportunity before action is taken
The methods used to manage the risk or opportunity
The costs of actions taken to manage the risk or opportunity

Relative to Leidos corporate revenue generation and overhead support operations, typical physical operating risks associated with climate change include a greater propensity for severe weather events such as tornadoes, hurricanes/flash flooding, blizzards/ice storms, extreme heat, drought and gradual sea level rise/continental sinking. There are no significant regulatory or other climate change induced risk or opportunities.

Potential physical risks associated with events fostered by climate change are worksite displacement and personal inconvenience where impacted work locations are temporarily out of operation and/or employees residing in an impacted area suffer damage to their homes temporarily redirecting personal priorities away from career objectives to focus on restoring one's personal life as quickly as possible.
During the time that Leidos operating locations are out-of-operation and/or employees are unable to work due to the need to recover from impacts to restore their personal lives, work-related productivity, and therefore revenue generation, may be adversely impacted in specific locales for specific program activities.
The Leidos Crisis Management team routinely monitors projected and day-to-day weather conditions with the potential to adversely impact operating locations and employee residence locations for rapidly addressing any mitigation opportunities.
Leidos spends approximately $500K/year to pay for third party products/services and employ the personnel who monitor and maintain the internal crisis management functions and systems.

G4-EC3

Where the plan’s liabilities are met by the organization’s general resources, report the estimated value of those liabilities.

Where a separate fund exists to pay the plan’s pension liabilities, report:

The extent to which the scheme’s liabilities are estimated to be covered by the assets that have been set aside to meet them
The basis on which that estimate has been arrived at
When that estimate was made

Where a fund set up to pay the plan’s pension liabilities is not fully covered, explain the strategy, if any, adopted by the employer to work towards full coverage, and the timescale, if any, by which the employer hopes to achieve full coverage.

Report the percentage of salary contributed by employee or employer.

Report the level of participation in retirement plans (such as participation in mandatory or voluntary schemes, regional or country-based schemes, or those with financial impact).

As of January 1, 2017, the Leidos Biomedical Research plan has 719 active participants, 547 deferred vested participants and 552 receiving pensions. This plan is approximately 99 percent funded as of January 1, 2017, on a stabilized funding basis. This plan is closed to future participants and as of January 1, 2017, only about 28 percent of active participants are still accruing benefits.

The second plan includes, as of July 1, 2017, approximately 177 deferred and 67 current pensioners. It is also closed to future participants, is sponsored by the Calanais Pension Trustee Co., Ltd., and is approximately 85 percent funded.

Environmental

G4 Indicator	G4 Disclosure Requirements	2016 Response
G4-EN3	Energy consumption within the organization: Report total fuel consumption from non-renewable sources in joules or multiples, including fuel types used. Report total fuel consumption from renewable fuel sources in joules or multiples, including fuel types used. Report in joules, watt-hours or multiples, the total: Electricity consumption Heating consumption Cooling consumption Steam consumption Report in joules, watt-hours or multiples, the total: Electricity sold Heating sold Cooling sold Steam sold Report total energy consumption in joules or multiples. Report standards, methodologies, and assumptions used. Report the source of the conversion factors used.	Environment > Corporate Footprint and Environmental Stewardship
G4-EN4	Energy consumption outside of the organization: Report energy consumed outside of the organization, in joules or multiples. Report standards, methodologies, and assumptions used. Report the source of the conversion factors used.	Leidos does not collect or track energy data from entities outside of the organization. Potential energy consumption sources outside of the organization might include employee commuting or business travel, but there is no available data to report for these sources.
G4-EN5	Energy intensity: Report the energy intensity ratio. Report the organization-specific metric (the ratio denominator) chosen to calculate the ratio. Report the types of energy included in the intensity ratio: fuel, electricity, heating, cooling, steam, or all. Report whether the ratio uses energy consumed within the organization, outside of it or both.	Energy intensity ratio: 95 kBtu/sqft. (buildings energy only). Organization-specific metric to calculate ratio: 7,559,595 square feet (buildings). The square footage metric represents annual equivalent square footage. This means that the square footage of each lease was prorated according the fraction of the year each lease was active. For example, a 100,000 sqft building occupied by Leidos for ½ of the year is equivalent to 50,000 sqft occupied for the entire year. Type of energy included (fuel, electricity, heating, cooling, steam, or all): Buildings energy only. Fuel and electricity are used by Leidos (no heating, cooling, or steam energy is purchased by Leidos). Fleet fuel consumption is not captured in the intensity ratio, because the base metric is square footage of buildings. All reported energy is consumed within the organization.
G4-EN6	Reduction of energy consumption: Report the amount of reductions in energy consumption achieved as a direct result of conservation and efficiency initiatives, in joules or multiples. Report the types of energy included in the reductions: fuel, electricity, heating, cooling, and steam Report the basis for calculating reductions in energy consumption such as base year or baseline, and the rationale for choosing it. Report standards, methodologies, and assumptions used.	Environment > Corporate Footprint and Environmental Stewardship

G4 Indicator	G4 Disclosure Requirements	2016 Response
G4-EN15	Direct greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (Scope 1): Report gross direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions in metric tons of CO₂ equivalent, independent of any GHG trades, such as purchases, sales, or transfers of offsets or allowances. Report gases included in the calculation (whether CO₂, CH₄, N₂O, HFCs, PFCs, SF₆, NF₃, or all). Report biogenic CO₂ emissions in metric tons of CO₂ equivalent separately from the gross direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions. Report the chosen base year, the rationale for choosing the base year, emissions in the base year, and the context for any significant changes in emissions that triggered recalculations of base year emissions. Report standards, methodologies, and assumptions used. Report the source of the emission factors used and the global warming potential (GWP) rates used or a reference to the GWP source. Report the chosen consolidation approach for emissions (equity share, financial control, operational control).	Environment > Corporate Footprint and Environmental Stewardship
G4-EN16	Energy indirect greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (Scope 2): Report gross energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions in metric tons of CO₂equivalent, independent of any GHG trades, such as purchases, sales, or transfers of offsets or allowances. Report gases included in the calculation, if available. Report the chosen base year, the rationale for choosing the base year, emissions in the base year, and the context for any significant changes in emissions that triggered recalculations of base year emissions. Report standards, methodologies, and assumptions used. Report the source of the emission factors used and the global warming potential (GWP) rates used or a reference to the GWP source, if available. Report the chosen consolidation approach for emissions (equity share, financial control, operational control).	Environment > Corporate Footprint and Environmental Stewardship
G4-EN17	Other indirect greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (Scope 3): Report gross other indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions in metric tons of CO₂equivalent, excluding indirect emissions from the generation of purchased or acquired electricity, heating, cooling, and steam consumed by the organization (these indirect emissions are reported in Indicator G4-EN16). Exclude any GHG trades, such as purchases, sales, or transfers of offsets or allowances. Report gases included in the calculation, if available. Report biogenic CO₂ emissions in metric tons of CO₂ equivalent separately from the gross other indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions. Report other indirect (Scope 3) emissions categories and activities included in the calculation. Report the chosen base year, the rationale for choosing the base year, emissions in the base year, and the context for any significant changes in emissions that triggered recalculations of base year emissions. Report standards, methodologies, and assumptions used. Report the source of the emission factors used and the global warming potential (GWP) rates used or a reference to the GWP source, if available.	Leidos does not track or report Scope 3 GHG emissions because data are not available to support TCR’s optional Scope 3 GHG Protocol requirements.
G4-EN18	Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity: Report the GHG emissions intensity ratio. Report the organization-specific metric (the ratio denominator) chosen to calculate the ratio. Report the types of GHG emissions included in the intensity ratio: direct (Scope 1), energy indirect (Scope 2), other indirect (Scope 3). Report gases included in the calculation.	GHG Emissions intensity ratio: 10.6 market-based kgCO2e/sqft. Organization-specific metric to calculate ratio: 7,559,595 Square Feet (buildings) – the square footage metric represents annual equivalent square footage. This means that the square footage of each lease was prorated according the fraction of the year each lease was active. For example, a 100,000 sqft building occupied by Leidos for ½ of the year is equivalent to 50,000 sqft occupied for the entire year. Types of GHG emissions included in the intensity ratio: Scope 1 emissions from natural gas fuel oil combustion for heating, gasoline and diesel fuel combustion in generators, and fugitive refrigerants from large owned air conditioning and refrigeration equipment. Also, Scope 2 emissions from purchased electricity and purchased natural gas heating in full service leases. Fleet emissions are not captured in the emissions intensity ratio, because the base metric is building square footage. Gases included in calculation: CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs.
G4-EN19	Reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions: Report the amount of GHG emissions reductions achieved as a direct result of initiatives to reduce emissions, in metric tons of CO₂ equivalent. Report gases included in the calculation (whether CO₂, CH₄, N₂O, HFCs, PFCs, SF₆, NF₃, or all). Report the chosen base year or baseline and the rationale for choosing it. Report standards, methodologies, and assumptions used. Report whether the reductions in GHG emissions occurred in direct (Scope 1), energy indirect (Scope 2), other indirect (Scope 3) emissions.	2016 GHG emissions reduction from 2015 achieved as a direct result of initiatives to reduce emissions (mtCO2e): 8,760 MTCO2e (Leidos North American assets only). Gases included in calculation: CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs. Base Year (2010): Leidos is also undergoing a recalculation of base year emissions in order to provide a comparable assessment of past emissions and maintain consistency in tracking progress toward GHG targets. Standard, Methodologies and Assumptions: Leidos uses standards, methodologies and assumptions from The Climate Registry’s General Reporting Protocol. Reductions were calculated by direct comparison of 2016 emissions estimates to 2015 emissions estimates for Leidos asset in North America. Where Reductions Occurred: About 78% of reductions came from decreased electricity purchases and power grid improvements. About 18% of reductions were from decreased natural gas use for heating and 4% were from reduced gasoline and diesel fuel consumption in fleet vehicles.

G4 Indicator	G4 Disclosure Requirements	2016 Response
G4-EN23	Total weight of waste by type and disposal method: Report the total weight of hazardous and non-hazardous waste, by the following disposal methods: Reuse Recycling Composting Recovery, including energy recovery Incineration (mass burn) Deep well injection Landfill On-site storage Other (to be specified by the organization) Report how the waste disposal method has been determined: Disposed of directly by the organization or otherwise directly confirmed Information provided by the waste disposal contractor Organizational defaults of the waste disposal contractor	Leidos has national contracts with professional waste management companies for recycling and waste disposal at all owned facilities. Total recycling and compost waste details are provided in the Environment > Corporate Footprint and Environmental Stewardship section. Leidos disposes of hazardous waste using Clean Harbors Environmental Services. In all cases, we are considered a small quantity generator per US EPA (less than 1,000 kilograms of hazardous waste per month). The waste is generally landfilled or incinerated at an EPA-permitted hazardous waste Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility (TSDF), as reported to Leidos by Clean Harbors Environmental Services.

G4 Indicator

G4 Disclosure Requirements

2016 Response

G4-EN23

Total weight of waste by type and disposal method:

Report the total weight of hazardous and non-hazardous waste, by the following disposal methods:

Reuse
Recycling
Composting
Recovery, including energy recovery
Incineration (mass burn)
Deep well injection
Landfill
On-site storage
Other (to be specified by the organization)

Report how the waste disposal method has been determined:

Disposed of directly by the organization or otherwise directly confirmed
Information provided by the waste disposal contractor
Organizational defaults of the waste disposal contractor

Leidos has national contracts with professional waste management companies for recycling and waste disposal at all owned facilities. Total recycling and compost waste details are provided in the Environment > Corporate Footprint and Environmental Stewardship section.

Leidos disposes of hazardous waste using Clean Harbors Environmental Services. In all cases, we are considered a small quantity generator per US EPA (less than 1,000 kilograms of hazardous waste per month). The waste is generally landfilled or incinerated at an EPA-permitted hazardous waste Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility (TSDF), as reported to Leidos by Clean Harbors Environmental Services.

G4 Indicator	G4 Disclosure Requirements	2016 Response
G4-EN32	Report the percentage of new suppliers that were screened using environmental criteria.	Leidos did not screen suppliers for environmental criteria in 2016.
G4-EN33	Significant actual and potential negative environmental impacts in the supply chain and actions taken: Report the number of suppliers subject to environmental impact assessments. Report the number of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative environmental impacts. Report the significant actual and potential negative environmental impacts identified in the supply chain. Report the percentage of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative environmental impacts with which improvements were agreed upon as a result of assessment. Report the percentage of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative environmental impacts with which relationships were terminated as a result of assessment, and why.	No known actual or potential supplier-related negative environmental impacts. Leidos does not currently require supply chain environmental impact assessments, however we expect that our suppliers will abide by our Code of Conduct.

G4 Indicator

G4 Disclosure Requirements

2016 Response

G4-EN32

Report the percentage of new suppliers that were screened using environmental criteria.

Leidos did not screen suppliers for environmental criteria in 2016.

G4-EN33

Significant actual and potential negative environmental impacts in the supply chain and actions taken:

Report the number of suppliers subject to environmental impact assessments. Report the number of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative environmental impacts. Report the significant actual and potential negative environmental impacts identified in the supply chain. Report the percentage of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative environmental impacts with which improvements were agreed upon as a result of assessment. Report the percentage of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative environmental impacts with which relationships were terminated as a result of assessment, and why.

No known actual or potential supplier-related negative environmental impacts. Leidos does not currently require supply chain environmental impact assessments, however we expect that our suppliers will abide by our Code of Conduct.

Social | Labor Practices and Decent Work

G4 Indicator	G4 Disclosure Requirements	2016 Response
G4-LA6	Type of injury and rates of injury, occupational diseases, lost days, and absenteeism, and total number of work-related fatalities, by region and by gender: Report types of injury, injury rate (IR), occupational diseases rate (ODR), lost day rate (LDR), absentee rate (AR) and work-related fatalities, for the total workforce (that is, total employees plus supervised workers), by: Region Gender Report types of injury, injury rate (IR), occupational diseases rate (ODR), lost day rate (LDR), absentee rate (AR) and work-related fatalities for independent contractors working on-site to whom the organization is liable for the general safety of the working environment, by: Region Gender Report the system of rules applied in recording and reporting accident statistics.	Leidos reports for the company's overall injury rate by total workforce only (vs. by gender or region). Environment > Environmental-health-and-safety

G4 Indicator

G4 Disclosure Requirements

2016 Response

G4-LA6

Type of injury and rates of injury, occupational diseases, lost days, and absenteeism, and total number of work-related fatalities, by region and by gender:

Report types of injury, injury rate (IR), occupational diseases rate (ODR), lost day rate (LDR), absentee rate (AR) and work-related fatalities, for the total workforce (that is, total employees plus supervised workers), by:

Region
Gender

Report types of injury, injury rate (IR), occupational diseases rate (ODR), lost day rate (LDR), absentee rate (AR) and work-related fatalities for independent contractors working on-site to whom the organization is liable for the general safety of the working environment, by:

Region
Gender

Report the system of rules applied in recording and reporting accident statistics.

Leidos reports for the company's overall injury rate by total workforce only (vs. by gender or region).

Environment > Environmental-health-and-safety

G4 Indicator	G4 Disclosure Requirements	2016 Response
G4-LA10	Programs for skills management and lifelong learning that support the continued employability of employees and assist them in managing career endings: Report on the type and scope of programs implemented and assistance provided to upgrade employee skills. Report on the transition assistance programs provided to facilitate continued employability and the management of career endings resulting from retirement or termination of employment.	People > Professional and Career Development

G4 Indicator

G4 Disclosure Requirements

2016 Response

G4-LA10

Programs for skills management and lifelong learning that support the continued employability of employees and assist them in managing career endings:

Report on the type and scope of programs implemented and assistance provided to upgrade employee skills. Report on the transition assistance programs provided to facilitate continued employability and the management of career endings resulting from retirement or termination of employment.

People > Professional and Career Development

G4 Indicator	G4 Disclosure Requirements	2016 Response
G4-LA12	Composition of governance bodies and breakdown of employees per employee category according to gender, age group, minority group membership, and other indicators of diversity: Report the percentage of individuals within the organization’s governance bodies in each of the following diversity categories: Gender Age group: under 30 years old, 30-50 years old, over 50 years old Minority groups Other indicators of diversity where relevant Report the percentage of employees per employee category in each of the following diversity categories: Gender Age group: under 30 years old, 30-50 years old, over 50 years old Minority groups Other indicators of diversity where relevant	For governance composition, see G4-34 response.

G4 Indicator

G4 Disclosure Requirements

2016 Response

G4-LA12

Composition of governance bodies and breakdown of employees per employee category according to gender, age group, minority group membership, and other indicators of diversity:

Report the percentage of individuals within the organization’s governance bodies in each of the following diversity categories:

Gender
Age group: under 30 years old, 30-50 years old, over 50 years old
Minority groups
Other indicators of diversity where relevant

Report the percentage of employees per employee category in each of the following diversity categories:

Gender
Age group: under 30 years old, 30-50 years old, over 50 years old
Minority groups
Other indicators of diversity where relevant

For governance composition, see G4-34 response.

G4 Indicator	G4 Disclosure Requirements	2016 Response
G4-LA14	Report the percentage of new suppliers that were screened using labor practices criteria.	Supplier and Small Business Relationships
G4-LA15	Significant actual and potential negative impacts for labor practices in the supply chain and actions taken: Report the number of suppliers subject to impact assessments for labor practices. Report the number of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative impacts for labor practices. Report the significant actual and potential negative impacts for labor practices identified in the supply chain. Report the percentage of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative impacts for labor practices with which improvements were agreed upon as a result of assessment. Report the percentage of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative impacts for labor practices with which relationships were terminated as a result of assessment, and why.	Supplier and Small Business Relationships Ethics and Compliance

G4 Indicator

G4 Disclosure Requirements

2016 Response

G4-LA14

Report the percentage of new suppliers that were screened using labor practices criteria.

Supplier and Small Business Relationships

G4-LA15

Significant actual and potential negative impacts for labor practices in the supply chain and actions taken:

Report the number of suppliers subject to impact assessments for labor practices. Report the number of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative impacts for labor practices. Report the significant actual and potential negative impacts for labor practices identified in the supply chain. Report the percentage of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative impacts for labor practices with which improvements were agreed upon as a result of assessment. Report the percentage of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative impacts for labor practices with which relationships were terminated as a result of assessment, and why.

Supplier and Small Business Relationships

Ethics and Compliance

G4 Indicator	G4 Disclosure Requirements	2016 Response
G4-LA16	Number of grievances about labor practices filed, addressed, and resolved through formal grievance mechanisms: Report the total number of grievances about labor practices filed through formal grievance mechanisms during the reporting period. Of the identified grievances, report how many were: Addressed during the reporting period Resolved during the reporting period Report the total number of grievances about labor practices filed prior to the reporting period that were resolved during the reporting period.	Ethics and Compliance

G4 Indicator

G4 Disclosure Requirements

2016 Response

G4-LA16

Number of grievances about labor practices filed, addressed, and resolved through formal grievance mechanisms:

Report the total number of grievances about labor practices filed through formal grievance mechanisms during the reporting period. Of the identified grievances, report how many were:

Addressed during the reporting period
Resolved during the reporting period

Report the total number of grievances about labor practices filed prior to the reporting period that were resolved during the reporting period.

Ethics and Compliance

Social | Society

G4 Indicator	G4 Disclosure Requirements	2016 Response
G4-SO1	Percentage of operations with implemented local community engagement, impact assessments, and development program: Report the percentage of operations with implemented local community engagement, impact assessments, and development programs, including the use of: Social impact assessments, including gender impact assessments, based on participatory processes Environmental impact assessments and ongoing monitoring Public disclosure of results of environmental and social impact assessments Local community development programs based on local communities' needs Stakeholder engagement plans based on stakeholder mapping Broad based local community consultation committees and processes that include vulnerable groups Works councils, occupational health and safety committees and other employee representation bodies to deal with impacts Formal local community grievance processes	Leidos does not currently track this metric. Most of our locations, however, engage in outreach within their communities. Included in this report are several examples of our efforts in both specific communities and amongst specific populations, as well as our community engagement priority areas. We believe that these programs and activities are effective, yet continue to look for ways to maximize their positive effects and minimize any negative impacts. Community Community > Corporate Philanthropy

G4 Indicator

G4 Disclosure Requirements

2016 Response

G4-SO1

Percentage of operations with implemented local community engagement, impact assessments, and development program:

Report the percentage of operations with implemented local community engagement, impact assessments, and development programs, including the use of:

Social impact assessments, including gender impact assessments, based on participatory processes
Environmental impact assessments and ongoing monitoring
Public disclosure of results of environmental and social impact assessments
Local community development programs based on local communities' needs
Stakeholder engagement plans based on stakeholder mapping
Broad based local community consultation committees and processes that include vulnerable groups
Works councils, occupational health and safety committees and other employee representation bodies to deal with impacts
Formal local community grievance processes

Leidos does not currently track this metric. Most of our locations, however, engage in outreach within their communities. Included in this report are several examples of our efforts in both specific communities and amongst specific populations, as well as our community engagement priority areas. We believe that these programs and activities are effective, yet continue to look for ways to maximize their positive effects and minimize any negative impacts.

Community

Community > Corporate Philanthropy

G4 Indicator	G4 Disclosure Requirements	2016 Response
G4-SO3	Total number and percentage of operations assessed for risks related to corruption and the significant risks identified: Report the total number and percentage of operations assessed for risks related to corruption. Report the significant risks related to corruption identified through the risk assessment.	The Leidos Internal Audit department annually audits approximately 40%, or roughly eight, of our operations to ensure appropriate compliance with policies and procedures. Through this cyclical audit schedule, all business operations are audited regularly. In addition, the department conducted functional reviews throughout the corporation such as the audit of the Shared Service Center and Company-wide purchasing activity.
G4-SO4	Communication and training on anti-corruption policies and procedures: Report the total number and percentage of governance body members that the organization’s anti-corruption policies and procedures have been communicated to, broken down by region. Report the total number and percentage of employees that the organization’s anti-corruption policies and procedures have been communicated to, broken down by employee category and region. Report the total number and percentage of business partners that the organization’s anti-corruption policies and procedures have been communicated to, broken down by type of business partner and region. Report the total number and percentage of governance body members that have received training on anti-corruption, broken down by region. Report the total number and percentage of employees that have received training on anti-corruption, broken down by employee category and region.	Ethics and Compliance
G4-SO5	Confirmed incidents of corruption and actions taken: Report the total number and nature of confirmed incidents of corruption. Report the total number of confirmed incidents in which employees were dismissed or disciplined for corruption. Report the total number of confirmed incidents when contracts with business partners were terminated or not renewed due to violations related to corruption. Report public legal cases regarding corruption brought against the organization or its employees during the reporting period and the outcomes of such cases.	None

G4 Indicator

G4 Disclosure Requirements

2016 Response

G4-SO3

Total number and percentage of operations assessed for risks related to corruption and the significant risks identified:

Report the total number and percentage of operations assessed for risks related to corruption. Report the significant risks related to corruption identified through the risk assessment.

The Leidos Internal Audit department annually audits approximately 40%, or roughly eight, of our operations to ensure appropriate compliance with policies and procedures. Through this cyclical audit schedule, all business operations are audited regularly. In addition, the department conducted functional reviews throughout the corporation such as the audit of the Shared Service Center and Company-wide purchasing activity.

G4-SO4

Communication and training on anti-corruption policies and procedures:

Report the total number and percentage of governance body members that the organization’s anti-corruption policies and procedures have been communicated to, broken down by region. Report the total number and percentage of employees that the organization’s anti-corruption policies and procedures have been communicated to, broken down by employee category and region. Report the total number and percentage of business partners that the organization’s anti-corruption policies and procedures have been communicated to, broken down by type of business partner and region. Report the total number and percentage of governance body members that have received training on anti-corruption, broken down by region. Report the total number and percentage of employees that have received training on anti-corruption, broken down by employee category and region.

Ethics and Compliance

G4-SO5

Confirmed incidents of corruption and actions taken:

Report the total number and nature of confirmed incidents of corruption. Report the total number of confirmed incidents in which employees were dismissed or disciplined for corruption. Report the total number of confirmed incidents when contracts with business partners were terminated or not renewed due to violations related to corruption. Report public legal cases regarding corruption brought against the organization or its employees during the reporting period and the outcomes of such cases.

None

G4 Indicator	G4 Disclosure Requirements	2016 Response
G4-SO6	Total value of political contributions by country and recipient/beneficiary: Report the total monetary value of financial and in-kind political contributions made directly and indirectly by the organization by country and recipient/beneficiary. Report how the monetary value of in-kind contributions was estimated, if applicable.	For the cycle 2016 (including calendar years 2015 and 2016) The Leidos Political Action Committee (L-PAC) made $367,500 in political contributions. No in-kind contributions were made. No political contributions were made to state and local candidates and committees and all L-PAC contributions were made within the United States.

G4 Indicator

G4 Disclosure Requirements

2016 Response

G4-SO6

Total value of political contributions by country and recipient/beneficiary:

Report the total monetary value of financial and in-kind political contributions made directly and indirectly by the organization by country and recipient/beneficiary. Report how the monetary value of in-kind contributions was estimated, if applicable.

For the cycle 2016 (including calendar years 2015 and 2016) The Leidos Political Action Committee (L-PAC) made $367,500 in political contributions. No in-kind contributions were made. No political contributions were made to state and local candidates and committees and all L-PAC contributions were made within the United States.

G4 Indicator	G4 Disclosure Requirements	2016 Response
G4-SO7	Total number of legal actions for anti-competitive behavior, anti-trust, and monopoly practices and their outcomes: Report the total number of legal actions pending or completed during the reporting period regarding anti-competitive behavior and violations of anti-trust and monopoly legislation in which the organization has been identified as a participant. Report the main outcomes of completed legal actions, including any decisions or judgments.	None

G4 Indicator

G4 Disclosure Requirements

2016 Response

G4-SO7

Total number of legal actions for anti-competitive behavior, anti-trust, and monopoly practices and their outcomes:

Report the total number of legal actions pending or completed during the reporting period regarding anti-competitive behavior and violations of anti-trust and monopoly legislation in which the organization has been identified as a participant. Report the main outcomes of completed legal actions, including any decisions or judgments.

None

G4 Indicator	G4 Disclosure Requirements	2016 Response
G4-SO8	Monetary value of significant fines and total number of non-monetary sanctions for non-compliance with laws and regulations: Report significant fines and non-monetary sanctions in terms of: Total monetary value of significant fines Total number of non-monetary sanctions Cases brought through dispute resolution mechanisms If the organization has not identified any non-compliance with laws or regulations, a brief statement of this fact is sufficient. Report the context against which significant fines and non-monetary sanctions were incurred.	None Ethics and Compliance

G4 Indicator

G4 Disclosure Requirements

2016 Response

G4-SO8

Monetary value of significant fines and total number of non-monetary sanctions for non-compliance with laws and regulations:

Report significant fines and non-monetary sanctions in terms of:

Total monetary value of significant fines
Total number of non-monetary sanctions
Cases brought through dispute resolution mechanisms

If the organization has not identified any non-compliance with laws or regulations, a brief statement of this fact is sufficient. Report the context against which significant fines and non-monetary sanctions were incurred.

None

Ethics and Compliance

Social | Product Responsibility

G4 Indicator	G4 Disclosure Requirements	2016 Response
G4-PR8	Total number of substantiated complaints regarding breaches of customer privacy and losses of customer data: Report the total number of substantiated complaints received concerning breaches of customer privacy, categorized by: Complaints received from outside parties and substantiated by the organization Complaints from regulatory bodies Report the total number of identified leaks, thefts, or losses of customer data. If the organization has not identified any substantiated complaints, a brief statement of this fact is sufficient.	None Ethics and Compliance > Data Privacy

G4 Indicator

G4 Disclosure Requirements

2016 Response

G4-PR8

Total number of substantiated complaints regarding breaches of customer privacy and losses of customer data:

Report the total number of substantiated complaints received concerning breaches of customer privacy, categorized by:

Complaints received from outside parties and substantiated by the organization
Complaints from regulatory bodies

Report the total number of identified leaks, thefts, or losses of customer data. If the organization has not identified any substantiated complaints, a brief statement of this fact is sufficient.

None

Ethics and Compliance > Data Privacy

G4 Indicator	G4 Disclosure Requirements	2016 Response
G4-PR9	Monetary value of significant fines for non-compliance with laws and regulations concerning the provision and use of products and services: Report the total monetary value of significant fines for non-compliance with laws and regulations concerning the provision and use of products and services. If the organization has not identified any non-compliance with laws or regulations, a brief statement of this fact is sufficient.	None

G4 Indicator

G4 Disclosure Requirements

2016 Response

G4-PR9

Monetary value of significant fines for non-compliance with laws and regulations concerning the provision and use of products and services:

Report the total monetary value of significant fines for non-compliance with laws and regulations concerning the provision and use of products and services. If the organization has not identified any non-compliance with laws or regulations, a brief statement of this fact is sufficient.

None